[Enterprise]

I'll take a swing at this. First, I accept that the women who contribute to President Trump view him as an acceptable leader in things like the economy, health care, national security and border security. None of the candidates of either party can demonstrate some magical plans that are convincingly better than what President Trump is doing.

But I also sense a more subtle, but strong, motivation. I think women in general abhor Kamala Harris, AOC, Omar, and Tlaib. Now of the four, Harris is running for President, and I think that women know her history, and she disgusts them. Of the other three, their high profiles anger women. They are viewed as either shockingly ignorant, AOC for example, or in the cases of Omar and Tlaib, virulently anti United States.

I wouldn't try to predict the chances of any of these females on winning future re-election, but for now they are a huge negative blowtorch to the Democrats.

[dp0622]

Great post. And I agree.

I don’t much care if AOC and Omar win their seats again, which they likely will.

They ARE overwhelmingly approved of in their districts. Who do we think voted them in, in the first place?

They did not lie about what they were.

And those seats were ABSOLUTE dem seats anyway.

The bonus is we get two women who keep CONSTANTLY hurting their party and throwing intelligent women’s votes our way.

Along with a bigger slice of the Jewish vote, I am hoping, because of Omar.

[RacerX1128]

don’t forget nanny pelosi....she has to be a contributing factor in the equation...no?

[hinckley buzzard]

I think it’s simpler than that. Normal women, like most men, don’t much care about identity politics. They didn’t vote overwhelmingly for Hillary, and they don’t care about the idea of “vote for a woman— any woman—.”