Posted on 05/08/2019 2:47:56 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) chided President Trump for embarrassing former FBI agent Peter Strzok and bureau attorney Lisa Page at a House Judiciary Committee open hearing on Wednesday. Jeffries said there was no witch hunt because all the people who started the investigation (Comey) or were investigators (Mueller) were Republicans.
(snip)
"You were not concerned about the representational interest of Hillary Clinton," Jeffries said to Trump. "In fact, the top Republicans said the sole objective was to undermine her, the former first lady and Secretary of State. You weren't concerned with the reputational interest of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. In fact, you embarrassed those two. They made mistakes, but you embarrassed those two."
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Cry me a river. Let's see how embarrassed they are when sentence is handed down.
A white couple needs a black man to stand up for them. Go figure.
A mistake is when you put the wrong answer down on a multiple choice question. What those losers did are crimes that should be punishable by hanging or firing squad.
Iranian raised American Jihadi
O
K
I’ll just wait for the comments here
Too stunned to utter anything at that statement
“barr is also part of that deep state, “
Barr is part of the Trump team.
No. Sessions recused himself from the team.
Ah yes....those were the heady days when Hillary was considered a “shoo-in.” (smirk)
Strzok and Page weren’t concerned with their reputations
nor were they concerned about hurting their spouses....
The two lovebirds freely aired their dirty linen on govt-issue computers.
How stupid was that?
Half-*** Hakeem has got it ***backwards.
...Barr is also part of that deep state...”
An insane assertion.
Barr is a by the book law and order hard a$$ and has consistently illustrated that in both tenures as AG.
You can know the deep state, even manipulate it to a degree without being a part of it. Barr is his own man.
Your comment reminds me of many on here that call everyone who may disagree with the Pres. on an issue here and there a “never Trumper”.
Both are routinely over-applied and tend to diminish the impact when someone actually deserves the designation.
Theyre criminals Hakeem. You know. Like most dhimmicrats.
Faccia Brute.
Julius and Ethel made mistakes too, and paid for them in the appropriate manner.
You let me know when barr actually does something other then talk. His act of releasing the full mueller report only served to further damage Trump’s presidency. You can repeat the assertion that that is what Trump wanted, but that is BS. That was all barr and left Trump out to dry. Trump had no choice but to object publicly, or say that is what he wanted. The calculation of which was worse for him, was his. I did not agree with it, but then I’m not POTUS.
Fugly too!
Id like to wipe that smirk off that arrogant POS with a baseball bat.
“You let me know when barr actually does something other then talk.”
Good grief give him a bit of time. He’s been in the office for less than 60 days and has already had a notable. He has initiated investigations which the scope, extent and what will be the ultimate results cannot be possibly known at this time
“His act of releasing the full mueller report only served to further damage Trumps presidency”
Oh bullcrap.....It was the smartest route to take as the media speculation, innuendo, rank conjecture etc. of what was actually in the report would have been far worse than the actual report. Portions would have been selectively leaked causing a tortured portrait of Mueller’s findings far more ominous than the reality.
it was the ONLY action that made sense and likely was done with Trump’s “bonafide” concurrence.
....notable “effect”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.