Or why not just answer the question again, since I obviously missed your alleged response to the question asked at #56?
Is this too complex?
“He clearly is taking exception with his policies with respect to N. Korea. For someone taking that stance I’d rightly call it foolish ignorance too and naive to think you can reason and make nice with a mad man. While I may not agree that meeting him is foolish and ignorant to try to place a foot forward, I still do not think such belief to the contrary is anti anything.
So no I wasn’t against him trying to talk to N. Korea however in retrospect I was an ignorant fool to believe that meeting fatboy the madman of the North would result in anything different than what is playing out. There is no hatred in that comment.”