[Jarhead9297]

“He clearly is taking exception with his policies with respect to N. Korea. For someone taking that stance I’d rightly call it foolish ignorance too and naive to think you can reason and make nice with a mad man. While I may not agree that meeting him is foolish and ignorant to try to place a foot forward, I still do not think such belief to the contrary is anti anything.

So no I wasn’t against him trying to talk to N. Korea however in retrospect I was an ignorant fool to believe that meeting fatboy the madman of the North would result in anything different than what is playing out. There is no hatred in that comment.”

[dragnet2]

Wow, that first paragraph is pretty much convoluted. So no I wasn’t against him trying to talk to N. Korea however in retrospect I was an ignorant fool to believe that meeting fatboy the madman of the North would result in anything different than what is playing out.

Why does your comment above imply the talks/meeting/negotiations are all over. Do you know something the rest of us don't?

[dragnet2]

So no I wasn’t against him trying to talk to N. Korea however in retrospect I was an ignorant fool to believe that meeting fatboy the madman of the North would result in anything different than what is playing out. There is no hatred in that comment.”

So you initially were supportive of Trump talking to and meeting with a "Madman"? And when did you conclude Kim is a madman? What was it that made you feel like an ignorant fool for being supportive of Trump meeting with him?