Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chickensoup

See if you can follow this. It is unconstitutional for the government to restrict speech which also means compelling speech. That’s what the Colorado baker case was about. It is not unconstitutional for a privately held company to restrict speech. Do you understand that? Is a Facebook account worth inviting the government to control social media and start acting as a censor? Have you stopped to think you are aligning yourself with BO? Why do you think BO and the entire prog movement take your position? Facebook should be free to conduct business they way they see fit. And if that means they ban every conservative voice so be it.

Allowing the government to control social media is a far worse problem and a threat to our liberty. You really think the US Federal government is going to protect conservative speech on social media? Nativity runs deep here.


22 posted on 05/05/2019 8:22:36 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomNotSafety

Allowing the government to control social media is a far worse problem and a threat to our liberty. You really think the US Federal government is going to protect conservative speech on social media? Nativity runs deep here.

+++++++++++

No all on the net needs to regulated as utilities so it provides unregulated and uncensored and un manipulated inforation.

We differ.


24 posted on 05/05/2019 8:24:40 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson