Replies

I think the best approach here might be to reflect on FR history which is all archived. Are you happy to examine your posts in the Singapore Hoopla period, and after that for a number of long months, leading up to just before then Hanoi debacle (where the President finally took some good advice for a change around him (Bolton, Pompeo, Beigun), dialed it back and confronted the Norks with an envelope with what we knew about them)?

We can certainly re-live what I posted as well. We will see who had a better handle on the situation and called it right all along. You have had my examples of how appeasement was engaged in, going back to last year. If you cannot find those, or chose to ignore them, then sad to say that is entirely your problem. I am not going to do your homework for you. sorry.

I think the best approach here might be to reflect on FR history which is all archived.

I laid it out for you. Exactly how the happiness of finally confronting the issue played out, nobody was unrealistic about the true outcomes. People were very happy that we had a president who finally took up the issue in a manner that intimaed it would be resolved one way or another.

It's one of the toughest nuts to crack there is, and yet you act as if Trump really blew it at most turns, and revealed himself to be a blustering buffoon.

You're the blustering buffoon.

Are you happy to examine your posts in the Singapore Hoopla period, and after that for a number of long months, leading up to just before then Hanoi debacle (where the President finally took some good advice for a change around him (Bolton, Pompeo, Beigun), dialed it back and confronted the Norks with an envelope with what we knew about them)?

You can dig up anything you like. I don't post stuff on the forum for it not to be seen. Knock yourself out.

As for negotiations taking different circuitous routes, I'm sure that has never happened before. This drivel you post is just moronic. You think you're scoring points. It's just ignorance on display.

You take every little thing and blow it out of the water like Maxine Waters or that Cortez nut-job would.

Trump is going to use every trick in the book. Whether he is successful or not, it's not as if anyone would be guaranteed to succede with this guy.

You yourself have been posting for months that Kim can't be trusted. Then when Trump does something you go all skitzoid on us and start trashing him as if he just ruined any chance of a deal. You criticize him, the people he takes with him, the tactics he uses, and anything else you can pull out of your a--.

Which is it ace? Can negotiations with Kim work or not? If not, why are you so frantically criticizing Trump's methods moment to moment?

We can certainly re-live what I posted as well.

I've seen some of the things you posted, and remembering quite well your inability to sound any more reasoned in any of them, I'll take a pass on that. Of course you're welcome to embarrass yourself futher if you like.

We will see who had a better handle on the situation and called it right all along.

You haven't called one thing right worth mentioning, that I've seen you mention so far. You've carped like a six year old angry that someone took his snack at school, whining to his mommy. "Uh, I told everyone Kim was not to be trusted! See, I was right. I was the only one that was right. Want me to go pack and prove to you I was right?"

Do you know how juvenile you come off. None of us were convinced Kim was going to roll over. These are the sorts of thing you thought you and you alone knew. It was laughable then. It's laughable now. In truth it would be humiliating to anyone with half a clue.

You have had my examples of how appeasement was engaged in, going back to last year.

I asked you at least once before, and possibly two times when we exchaged words. Neither time did you dane to inform me with your incredible knowledge base of how Trump appeased Kim.

If you cannot find those, or chose to ignore them, then sad to say that is entirely your problem.

Not my problem. You were asked, and couldn't respond on point. It only takes a sentence or two. Man up. I know that's a lot to ask.

I know how angry it made you when Hillary lost, but Trump is our president now, and most Conservatives wish to support his efforts, even if you think you are ten times smarter. I'm certainly not buying it.

I am not going to do your homework for you. sorry.

Sorry is right. You incessant carping about Trump's efforts with regard to North Korea has already revealed that..