Posted on 05/03/2019 9:11:30 AM PDT by Navy Patriot
Hillary Clinton recently editorialized about the second volume of special counsel Robert Muellers massive report. She concluded of the reports assorted testimonies and inside White House gossip concerning President Trumps words and actions that any other person engaged in those acts would certainly have been indicted.
Psychologists might call her claims projection. That is the well-known psychological malady of attributing bad behavior to others as a means of exonerating ones own similar, if not often even worse, sins.
After 22 months of investigation and $34 million spent, the Mueller report concluded that there was no Trump-Russia collusion the main focus of the investigation even though that unfounded allegation dominated print and televised medias speculative headlines for the last two years.
(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...
if you read the article, the entire ‘opposition’ is still hanging its hat on the ‘oh, mueller wanted to indict for obstruction, but knew you cant do that to a sitting president, so trump was/is guilty, nahhha, naaaah, naaahhh’...
mueller just threw that crap in to give the dhimmis something wish upon....and it pisses me off that he did that...
I wish barr would have addressed that aspect as to how him and rowdy roddy Rosenstein had seen fit to NOT confirm any obstruction.....
I agree with your point, and to mitigate that, I use Outline (www.outline.com).
Open Outline, then enter the news site article's URL in the box and read the article. Works on paywalls, too.
But the Republicans praised Robert Mueller when they all knew it was a witch hunt.
I’m thinking that Hillary was actually fired from the Watergate Committee for lying.
Lying & hiding\withholding evidence if I remember it right.
She was trying to argue that Nixon couldn’t have counsel. I think she withhold\hid material that would have weakened her argument.
This is all coming to a big white head, on the center of Hillary Clinton’s nose.
Pinglater
...and be sure: your sin will find you out.
Numbers 32:23
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, served as chief counsel to the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate hearings.. fired Hillary : an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality..
Thanks for the details!
Anyway VDH left that off!
VDH left out Hellary being fired from the Rat side of the Watergate House (or Senate - cant remember which one!) investigating committee for unethical behavior.
If I remember this right VDH was\(maybe still is) a democrat.
I don’t know, but he is definitely a Trump supporter.
Now I remember about Zeifman stepping forward to open the subject up again to state what an unethical liar Hillary is after what William Safire had to say about her lying in an article he once wrote! Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.