[BroJoeK]

FLT-bird: "Treaties carry the force of constitutional law.
No, not merely the force of law - constitutional law."

Bull snipe: "Only if 2/3s of the Confederate Senate approve the treaty."

FLT-bird: "I don't know why y'all are so desperate to argue this.
Its been posted with quotes and sources numerous times.
This is not exactly a controversial fact."

DoodleDawg: "Making crap up as you go along like I said."

FLT-bird: "Tell ya what.
I'll put my legal education up against yours any day."

Not everyone agrees with FLT-bird's legal opinions, this site for example:

"The following qualifies as one of the greatest lies the globalists continue to push upon the American people.
That lie is:
"Treaties supersede the US Constitution."
The second follow-up lie is this one:
"A treaty, once passed, cannot be set aside."
Here are the clear irrefutable facts that have cleared up all the confusion that existed in many people's minds.

The US Supreme Court has made it very clear that

• Treaties do not override the US Constitution.
• Treaties cannot amend the Constitution.
• A treaty can be nullified by a statute passed by the US Congress, or by a sovereign State or States if the Congress refuses to do so, when the State deems a treaty the performance of a treaty is self-destructive.
  The law of self-preservation overrules the law of obligation in others.
When you have read this thoroughly, hopefully, you will never again sit quietly by when someone -- anyone -- claims that treaties supersede the Constitution."

The article goes on to list its cases & references.

Note that it refers to FLT-bird's claim as "one of the greatest lies the globalists continue to push upon the American people".
That might tell us something about where, exactly, FLT-bird got his legal education.

[FLT-bird]

Oh look. The same pathetically obsessed troll is back to responding to me again.

If I started a count of his attempts to engage me in his nonsense in this thread what does everybody think we’d get up to? 80? He’s come close to that before. More?