Skip to comments.
Judicial Watch: Top Hillary Clinton Aide Admits Under Oath that He and Clinton Used Unsecure...
Judicial Watch ^
| May 1, 2019
| Tom Fitton
Posted on 05/01/2019 5:27:27 PM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: jazusamo
21
posted on
05/01/2019 5:53:10 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: jazusamo
Unfortunately Judicial Watch can’t prosecute anyone.
22
posted on
05/01/2019 5:53:28 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
To: thoughtomator
23
posted on
05/01/2019 5:53:30 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Secret Agent Man
...next week, with a red scarf in a motel room...
24
posted on
05/01/2019 6:01:17 PM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT)
To: jazusamo
Well, this guy won’t live very long.
25
posted on
05/01/2019 6:03:12 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: bitt; LucyT
To: jazusamo
"Judicial Watch: Top Hillary Clinton Aide Admits Under Oath that He and Clinton Used Unsecure Personal Email for Official State Department Business "
27
posted on
05/01/2019 6:04:46 PM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: laplata
It’s Judicial Watch...the Trey Gowdy of all talk, no do.
28
posted on
05/01/2019 7:06:11 PM PDT
by
Bommer
(Help 2ndDivisionVet - https://www.gofundme.com/mvc.php?route=category&term=married-recent-amputeca)
To: Jet Jaguar; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...
29
posted on
05/01/2019 7:09:28 PM PDT
by
bitt
(The pain IS coming!!!)
To: Bommer
30
posted on
05/01/2019 7:56:21 PM PDT
by
laplata
(The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: jazusamo
BS - I reported Hillary’s HRC22@Clintonmail.Com to Diplomatic Security and was basically blacklisted, given a verbal reprimand by my ambassador (who told me I couldn’t tell him why he was reprimanding me).
31
posted on
05/01/2019 8:07:41 PM PDT
by
Jumper
(The DNC's Big Tent ... a place where he opposition to America comes together)
To: Jumper
Wow. Thank you for upholding your oath, even if nobody else does.
32
posted on
05/01/2019 9:58:48 PM PDT
by
Auntie Mame
(Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
To: Da Coyote
did he have to sign an acknowledgement of the law and his responsibility like clinton was supposed to have done?
33
posted on
05/01/2019 10:16:58 PM PDT
by
rolling_stone
(Hang em slowly don't boil the rope make it a little short...)
To: jazusamo
I heard he was very helpful in choosing some of the party favors for Chelsea’s wedding.
To: digger48
The private server setup itself was all the intent any reasonable prosecutor would have needed to indict Yes. This, exactly.
I've been saying this for years. This server was never set up for "convenience," or whatever other reason Clinton gave as an explanation. One can only conclude that the presence of the server was to prevent certain communications from her from being archived or retrieved as government records. This alone, sans any other evidence, should've been enough to indict.
What concerns me is that under Obama's "Justice" department, any evidence remaining on that server has long since been destroyed, and that wouldn't be enough to convict her.
35
posted on
05/02/2019 7:10:58 AM PDT
by
Lou L
(Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
To: Secret Agent Man
Everyone who has security clearances gets it clearly spelled out multiple times what is allowed and what isnt. They give people examples to explain why something is or isnt permitted.
And it is not complicated. It is a system designed for 18-year-old kids off the street to execute properly.
36
posted on
05/02/2019 10:03:31 AM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: jazusamo
The DOJ dust off Hillary’s file and decide to indict and try her. Some people may question whether double jeopardy would come into play and the answer is unequivocally NO.
37
posted on
05/02/2019 10:15:37 AM PDT
by
monocle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson