Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: terycarl
Medieval hoax?????...So people then could devize a method to do that and people in this age couldn’t figure it out.....please!!!

I'm with you. Before we can argue about whether or not it's a 16th century fake, we first have to decide whether it's even possible for it to be a 16th century fake. From what I have learned of The Shroud, I would have to say 'no'.

37 posted on 04/28/2019 12:05:57 PM PDT by NurdlyPeon (It is the nature of liberals to pervert whatever they touch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: NurdlyPeon; terycarl
”Medieval hoax?????...So people then could devize a method to do that and people in this age couldn’t figure it out.....please!!!”

I'm with you. Before we can argue about whether or not it's a 16th century fake, we first have to decide whether it's even possible for it to be a 16th century fake. From what I have learned of The Shroud, I would have to say 'no'.

It’s even worse than that. . . It’s not 16th Century, try 14th Century. The Shroud supposedly first appeared in 1350 AD in Lirey, France, not the 1500s. Now we are talking much less realism in art. . . No perspective to speak of. Byzantine tastes, gilded haloes, flat countenances, limned outlines.

61 posted on 04/28/2019 5:09:53 PM PDT by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplaphobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson