Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As far as I am concerned Scientist know $hit
1 posted on 04/27/2019 4:55:32 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

bttt


2 posted on 04/27/2019 5:03:21 AM PDT by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

They know nuthin’, John Snow.


3 posted on 04/27/2019 5:34:24 AM PDT by zaxtres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Yep


4 posted on 04/27/2019 5:40:21 AM PDT by sauropod (Yield to sin, and experience chastening and sorrow; yield to God, and experience joy and blessing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

With Climate Change, the left is practicing a secular version of the islamic takfirism. It is a cultural appropriation of science by a bunch of women studies dykes who think getting short hairs, tattoos and a bitch bully attitude is what makes a man , culturally appropriating with make up artistry what men have build with blood, sweat and tears (roads, lights and war responsibility when the irresponsible let themselves shipped to Auschwitz or islamic harems).

Basically, much like the takfiries accusing Christians and jews of being Bible apostates, deserving death as only the Koranic way of celebrating Easter and Passover is approved and not apostate, our secular climate takfirie would burn at the stake a real scientist for not worshipping their dogma the correct way, one they appropriated in guerrilla warfare through intimidation.

This sheer intimidation means scientists, who would not have the ability to defend science as they would a belief, but simply abandon it or get fired, would end up growing in the ranks of the left out of fear of mere loss of job or government funding, the rest would be burned at the stake if opposing the coming takfiri leftist genocide.


6 posted on 04/27/2019 6:05:28 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hatse:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

We are under siege from global warming now. It’s been snowing east of Rochester NY most of the morning. That’s a sure sign we are all going to burn up from the heat due to run away warming. Doomed, doomed I tell you.


8 posted on 04/27/2019 6:23:34 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This so called science is really a pagan religion, with the State as its diety. Lysenko and Stalin are laughing in Hell.


9 posted on 04/27/2019 6:24:05 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“They don’t alter or “homogenize” raw or historic data to make it look like the models actually work.”

When your “adjusted” data tells the opposite story of the raw data...well...

...it ain’t science.


10 posted on 04/27/2019 6:38:34 AM PDT by JPJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I used to work doing explosive hydrodynamic testing. Once after a shot the new test physicist was looking at an image of the simulation and the x-ray of the actual explosive compression and ask while pointing at the x-ray “why doesn’t it look right.
The test engineer pointed at the x-ray and said “That one is real, the other one is just a bad cartoon.”
The bitch tried to get him fired. She was never allowed back in the bunker.


12 posted on 04/27/2019 6:50:22 AM PDT by Agatsu77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Climate change, huh? Global warning, huh? Then explain to my why the national weather service just issued a winter storm WARNING for Chicago...on APRIL 27th???


13 posted on 04/27/2019 6:54:42 AM PDT by VideoPaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"Even more outrageous, they’re using their pseudo-science to justify demands that we eliminate all fossil fuel use, and all carbon dioxide and methane emissions, by little more than a decade from now – or we will bring unprecedented cataclysms to people and planet."

Can't lose. If the carbon dioxide is reduced and the unprecedented cataclysms don't occur, they will credit themselves for the reductions. However, if even one minor cataclysm occurs than it will be because of something else that affected the climate, like the failure to pay enough reparations or the existence of racist statues.
14 posted on 04/27/2019 7:20:26 AM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Driessen is spot-on. He argues correctly that manmade CO2 is irrelevant. Some commenters here believe this incorrect diagram:

It's true that water vapor is about 2% of the atmosphere. But it is uneven so it's actual greenhouse effect is less than the evenly spread out gases. CO2 is 0.04% so there should be be just 2 yelliow-colored blocks out of the 100. But about 1/3 of those 2 blocks should be red signifying manmade. The claim that 3.4% of CO2 is caused by human activity is simply false. It compares manmade emissions (and equivalents like deforestation) to natural emissions. But it ignores natural uptake which is roughly the same as natural emissions. Essentially they are comparing the small manmade rise to the large natural flux:

The natural flux is much larger than the seasonal sinusoid shown above because there are natural emissions and natural uptake that coincide and don't contribute to the seasonal swing. But at the very least that chart shows that the natural variation in CO2 up and down is a lot higher than the manmade variation which is all up. That secular rise is (now) completely manmade (used to be partly natural from warming following the Little Ice Age)

And Driessen is spot-on about the effects. There is no increase in extreme weather. He is correct that strong to violent tornadoes are decreasing. Last year 2018 was the first on record in over a century of records without an EF-4 or EF-5 tornado. It is likely that "extreme" weather will decrease with a few minor exceptions.

15 posted on 04/27/2019 7:21:02 AM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Manipulated data +
manipulated sensors +
computer models and programs purposely designed to prove global warming is real +
evasion of counter examples + rejection of falsification +
socialism and statism motivation = fake science & pseudoscience


16 posted on 04/27/2019 7:26:58 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

You mean fake scientists, right? Real scientists are given a bad name because of all the fakery out there. Real scientists take a lot of c*** from fake scientists.


17 posted on 04/27/2019 7:41:52 AM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

BUMP!


18 posted on 04/27/2019 7:42:52 AM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

When your bread and butter, funding is given by the government you march lockstep with their narrative


20 posted on 04/27/2019 8:34:48 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“$2-million home in North Center Chicago” = elitist, though $2M is a starter home under Democrat driven inflation / skyrocketing cost of living.

“In this house we believe: No human is illegal” except unborn babies.

(And “in this house” there really are no illegals because a liberal would NEVER actually use his or her own home to house an illegal alien—they just use their $2M homes to sit in their cocoons and lecture the rest of America about “caring for the poor” just as Judas lectured Jesus before betraying Him.)

“Science is real” except when it comes to inconvenient scientific facts like there being exactly two biological sexes.

“keep fossil fuels in the ground” which means destroying one of the primary ways to create wealth (conversion of natural resources into productive work)

“Pro-choice” except school choice.

“Government transparency” except when it comes to hush money paid out by Congress.

Anyone who advocates modern-day liberalism should, at the very least, be locked up for his or her own protection. Most liberals who hold office are guilty of crimes against humanity that warrant capital punishment. Those who openly campaigned for them should lose their right to vote permanently, along with the right to bear arms, and they should have their wealth confiscated and redistributed (in the form of paying down our national debt).


21 posted on 04/27/2019 9:20:10 AM PDT by unlearner (War is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“So if NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio and other egotistical grand-standing politicians and fake climate scientists want to ban fossil fuels, glass-and-steel buildings, cows and even hotdogs– in the name of preventing ‘dangerous manmade climate change’ – let them impose their schemes on themselves and their own families.”

Improve the global climate by eliminating modern-day liberals, i.e. progressives / socialists.

“I knew right away where the owners stood on climate change, and other hot-button political issues.”

Jussie’s neighbors.


22 posted on 04/27/2019 9:23:50 AM PDT by unlearner (War is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Ping


24 posted on 04/27/2019 12:28:06 PM PDT by Teotwawki (For a person to get a thing without paying for it, another must pay for it without getting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson