Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rustbucket

Interesting exercise in opinion.

However, the issue is not the Tenth Amendment when referring to that conflict of the 1860s; the constitution adopted by the seceding states made that utterly plain.


83 posted on 04/27/2019 10:15:26 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai
Interesting exercise in opinion.

So, now I am supposed to believe that the words of the Founders who said what the Constitution meant when they ratified it meant nothing, but were only their "opinions?" The end result of your logic leads to the Living Constitution where politicians can alter interpretation of the Constitution to have it mean what they want it to. It may be your way of interpreting history, but it is not mine.

99 posted on 04/27/2019 7:02:15 PM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
However, the issue is not the Tenth Amendment when referring to that conflict of the 1860s; the constitution adopted by the seceding states made that utterly plain.

Please explain what you mean. The Tenth Amendment was/is part of the US Constitution. It applied/applies to all states in the Union. Explain to me how it doesn't apply to the right of a state to secede.

100 posted on 04/27/2019 7:15:04 PM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson