You seem to misunderstand this forum. Personal attacks on long-established members are against the rules (plainly referenced under the buttons when one posts a comment), and you’ve done it several times already. And the First Amendment specifically refers to Congress and laws, not to private online forums (see the Tenth Amendment).
Nothing revisionist about the CSA constitution, which you make revisionist excuses for and (for the record) that New Jersey was actually sympathetic to even until the end of the War Between The States as some people call it.
You seem to think that you are “the controlling authority” on this forum, rather than just ONE ordinary member among many.
(Fyi, how long that a person has been on any internet forum has nothing whatever to do with their education/knowledge/facts & whether or not that their stated opinions are wise, well-founded, uneducated, simplistic and/or foolish.)
As I said, I wish you well in “running to tattle” to management to shut me or any other forum member down. - We’ll see if TRUTH overcomes your opinion of what is “politically correct” to state on this forum in 2019.
Btw, I’m NOT going to let you get away with calling me (or dismissing my views as) a “Revisionist”, as “terms of art” in scholarship have fixed/well-known meanings.
As a “traditionalist” in historiography, I state that it is YOU who is a Revisionist (if anyone here is), as “we traditionals” are even in 2019 considered, by most historians, to be if “a bit old-fashioned”, at least the keepers of historical FACT..
Be sure to tell everyone how your “running to tattle to management” works out for you, given your silly threats.
Yours, TMN78247
Personal attacks on long-established members
It’s safer to attack a 2015 if you’re a 2000?
What other bennies do you get?