Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/24/2019 8:23:34 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Salvation

Oregon ping


2 posted on 04/24/2019 8:23:52 AM PDT by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
He also said it "represents an 'arrogant assumption' that government is better suited to direct health care instead of providers."

I wonder if this judge has issued opinions upholding Obozocare.

3 posted on 04/24/2019 8:26:50 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Modern feminism: ALL MEN BAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Enough already with these peon district Federal judges issuing NATIONWIDE rulings against Trump.

SCOTUS needs to slap down these judges for overreaching their jurisdictions.


4 posted on 04/24/2019 8:32:21 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

This judges rulings are “ham-fisted” and based on his liberal bias rather than the Constitution. No doubt in my mind he has no problems with a CA law requiring anti-abortion healthcare clinics being required to tell patients about abortions. Hypocrite is the single word that so aptly describes most democrats and democrat judges.


5 posted on 04/24/2019 8:35:02 AM PDT by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Judges who warn they’ll overturn something like a governor would warn of a veto

What an absolute abuse of office


6 posted on 04/24/2019 8:39:10 AM PDT by wardaddy (When only the best Santa will do...call Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Killing babies has nothing to do with Public Health.


7 posted on 04/24/2019 8:43:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

If he can find the “right to abort babies” in the Constitution, he might have a case.


8 posted on 04/24/2019 8:54:20 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Does it need saying?

“On September 19, 2012, President Obama nominated McShane to serve as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, to the seat vacated by Judge Michael R. Hogan who took senior status on September 24, 2011.[4] On January 2, 2013, his nomination was returned to the President, due to the sine die adjournment of the Senate. On January 3, 2013, he was renominated to the same office. His nomination was reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 7, 2013, by voice vote.[5] The Senate confirmed his nomination on May 20, 2013, by voice vote. He received his commission on May 30, 2013.[3]” Courtesy of Wikipedia


9 posted on 04/24/2019 9:04:13 AM PDT by Postman (The flies seek our domestic enemies.....but ain't no flies on DJT....MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

All I needed to see was “a Federal judge in Oregon” and I knew it’d be bad.


11 posted on 04/24/2019 9:15:14 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

US District Judge Michael J. McShane is another Barack Obama stooge, that chief justice John Roberts swears do not exist, that is paying Obama back for his appointment.


12 posted on 04/24/2019 9:19:39 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

One judge in a single district can lock up the whole country. They really need to change this.


13 posted on 04/24/2019 10:14:55 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson