I predicted this. There was no waiver of privilege because McGahn was testifying within the executive branch. Once the issue is separation of powers , it kicks in. This is so funny!!Shut up McGahn!! You Putz!!
To: bingoplayer
The House needs to get that unethical Weissman to testify for them.
2 posted on
04/23/2019 6:37:47 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: bingoplayer
I just like to see the combination of WHITE HOUSE and FIGHTS when an R is in there.
It’s been so long :)
3 posted on
04/23/2019 6:38:29 PM PDT by
dp0622
(The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
To: bingoplayer
I know nothing about McGahn.
4 posted on
04/23/2019 6:38:44 PM PDT by
hsmomx3
To: bingoplayer
Executive Privilege to nuke any John Dean fantasies
5 posted on
04/23/2019 6:39:15 PM PDT by
montag813
To: bingoplayer
6 posted on
04/23/2019 6:39:40 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: bingoplayer
7 posted on
04/23/2019 7:28:00 PM PDT by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: bingoplayer
Why isn’t this attorney client privilege?
8 posted on
04/23/2019 7:45:53 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: bingoplayer
He should seal all his records by executive order-everything. Let go through the court system, all the way to the Supreme Court, for every little thing they want.
9 posted on
04/23/2019 7:47:07 PM PDT by
dgbrown
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson