Posted on 04/21/2019 1:49:40 AM PDT by TigerClaws
About six months ago, a blogpost by “Publius Tacitus” appeared regarding attorney Ty Clevenger’s FOIA request regarding Seth Rich: “But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth’s role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that: Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET.
If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.”
At the time this appeared, I felt that it was of high significance, but I wasn’t quite sure what it meant. What is meant by “any information regarding Julian Assange and Seth Rich?” Reports generated within the NSA that mention both? Communications in which either mentions the other? Direct communications between the two? What was the actual language of Clevenger’s request?
The final sentence of the blogpost seems to muddy the waters even more: Eighth, the NSA has confirmed that it has Top Secret and Secret documents responsive to a FOIA request for information concerning contact between Seth Rich and other people including Julian Assange. “And other people”?
Although I was somewhat confused by the meaning of this revelation, I commented on its significance. At the very least, it meant that the view that Seth was the source of the Wikileaks DNC releases was more than the brainless and callous conspiracy theory that mainstream media were making it out to be.
Fortunately, Bill Binney, one of the founding fathers of the NSA, and universally acknowledged to be one of the most brilliant people who ever worked for the U.S. government, has offered clarification on this issue in a brief interview with Ed Butowsky he gave two days ago.
In this interview, he offers a devastating rebuke of the fraudulence of the Mueller report’s analysis of “Russian hacking”. But the truly fascinating part occurs at about 6:40, where Binney discusses Clevenger’s FOIA request.
Here’s what Binney says: “Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange.
And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them. That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.”
If Binney is interpreting this correctly — and bear in mind that, not only is he extraordinarily bright, but he is sometimes referred to as “the father of the NSA” — this provides strong support for the hypothesis that Seth was indeed Wikileaks’ source for the DNC emails it published. Assange has strongly hinted at this, Sy Hersh claims to have a trusted informant inside the FBI who states that he has seen FBI documents verifying this, and Binney himself says that he has two sources inside the intel community vouching for this.
Go to the 8:30 mark — Binney inadvertently refers to “Seth” when he means “Sy”.) Consistent with the possibility that Seth (or some other DNC employee) leaked the documents, Binney and colleagues have recently demonstrated that the DNC documents passed through a thumbdrive prior to their publication. There would have been no obvious need for such a transfer if Russians had hacked them remotely. Beyond that, as Binney makes clear, the Mueller report’s tale of how Wikileaks received the DNC emails from GRU agents styling themselves as “Guccifer 2.0” is absurd on its face to reasonable people who will examine the pertinent evidence. Mueller’s New Indictment — Do the Feds Take Us for Idiots?!
According to Adam Carter’s G2.0 website, on June 12th, 2016, medium.com
Astute cyberanalysts such as Adam Carter, the Forensicator, and Binney himself have presented compelling evidence that, far from being a Russian hacker masquerading as Romanian, G2.0 has operated in US time zones, down-loaded some of his “hacks” via thumbdrive, purposely implanted “Russian fingerprints” in the meta-data of some of his releases, made amateur attempts to impersonate a Russian using intermittently broken English, and never himself published any documents denigratory to the Clinton campaign. The GRU, if indeed they had hacked the DNC, would have had no need for such a ridiculous figure — but G2.0 functions wonderfully as a vehicle for incriminating Russia as the source of the DNC emails published by Wikileaks, tarring Russia and Assange with the same brush. G2.0’s contact with Wikileaks shortly (too shortly!) before the Wikileaks DNC release was evidently an attempt to produce a false trail that investigators (i.e. Mueller) could point to as G2.0's hand-off of the DNC emails to Wikleaks.
And here’s another intriguing point. Crowdstrike’s co-founder Shawn Henry used to be Mueller’s deputy at the FBI, acting as head of the counterintelligence division. Adam Carter informs me that, while Henry headed that division, it made an attempt to destroy Wikileaks’ reputation by feeding it documents that had been purposely altered; fortunately, Wikileaks exercised its customary caution and refused to take the bait. G2.0 — very likely a creation of Crowdstrike — appears to have been another attempt to smear Wikileaks, one that has worked wonderfully well with much of the American public. Clinton’s incompetence was expiated, Wikileaks was smeared, and the Russia was further defamed, all in one stroke — the Deep State’s wet dream! Assange became, not a journalist working with an American whistleblower disgusted by the gross bias of the DNC against Bernie, but instead a tool of malign Russians intent on meddling in our democracy and saddling us with the ridiculous Trump. And, as to Seth Rich’s mysterious death, ask yourself this: who would have been in a perfect position to destroy the “Russian hacking” narrative that Clinton’s campaign and Crowdstrike had decided to run with?
So let’s push to get the real story out. And, if it turns out that Binney is right, we’ll need to apologize to Russia, and then decide whom to send to prison for the rest of their miserable prevaricating lives.
Also WND.com. Took me ten seconds with duck, duck, go.
In the case of Podesta, he was using gmail for email. It has been widely reported that he was the victim of a spear-phishing attack. His assistant who was managing his email was actually suspicious of a password change email, but after miscommunication between her and the computer guru she changed the password at the fake website.
Hillary and Obama have been keeping a rather low profile lately, haven’t they.
Conjuring up their next play with soros and those in the UK deepstate. Im sure the 20 Congolese immigrants at the border with ebola is one of them.
So you see why the coup conspirators will never be held to account? This is like an expensive sweater with one thread pulled. If you want to keep the sweater you have to ignore it. Sure “someone has to pay”. And someone IS paying. WE are. The people who actually did all this? They are all part of the con. Mueller, Comey, 0bama, Lynch, Hillary. If you start pulling these “loose threads” of the con whoever makes these decisions, Barr(?) someone else(?) has decided to let them all get away with it so we don’t “loose the sweater”. Problem is, since we aren’t going to “make them pay” the sweater now belongs to someone else.
Mueller is part of the con.
There is only one way to explain the events we all have common knowledge of and the explanation is pretty gd dist\urbing. The entire gd Democrat Party is one big f**king con. How else do you explain even a few simple things? Like Kavanaugh, or Imran Awan, #FusionCOllusion to name just a few. They get away with it every time because they are all in on the con. And every con man knows you never give up the con.
Condolences to family and friends of Seth Rich. SWAMPMURDER ALERT!
Pretty sure that Assange has already said that it was NOT the Russians PLUS Wikileaks offered a $20,000.00 to find the KILLER/KILLERS of Seth Rich!! hmmmmmm….
They need to make their speeches since they might need a lawyer in the near future!
Excellent piece please post this on the TV talk show thread that comes later on this morning would be much appreciated thanks rodguy 911
They won’t admit it but Trump can declassify and publish the relevant files.
I suspected something of the sort when I saw that Assange had been arrested.Note that we have heard nothing at all about him sisnce that arrest
Anybody know what “Executive Order 13526” says and which President issued it?
Also, if Pres. Trump didn’t issue “Executive Order 13526” then why hasn’t he countered it?
Repeat until memorized by everyone.
So the documents in question could be a supervisor asking if anyone knows about the subject. Not an admission that the NSA has anything. To much speculation in this OP. BTW I think Rich was the source, just not enough evidence yet to confirm and Assange isn’t going to release it because it is his hole card.
Nothing here new to anyone following George Webb 2 years ago.
I was curious the other day and dug through the Mueller report looking specifically for the "hacking" references, not too surprising, it's a big nothing burger. No person or method or time or place is mentioned. Only the cloak of a grand jury is mentioned there to cover up the joke.
Mueller’s probe was exceedingly narrow. It focused solely on the Trump campaign collusion charge and, finding nothing, added the DJT obstruction charges. The only peripheral investigations were those conducted against members of the Trump team for unrelated crimes and process crimes. Mueller’s claim that the DNC and Podesta hacks were Russian is completely gratuitous based on no investigation of the materials or equipment in question. This, along with large segments of the report will be debunked and discredited as political muckraking.
And what is the first and only rule of the con?
Never give up the con.
Following FISA legalities give most Americans headaches but a horrible murder is easy to follow and will totally destroy the Donk party, once fully exposed.
Let’s hope POTUS Trump with all his experience in media and TV realizes this and works with Assange to unfold this crime story....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.