Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger
Page 4...more BS! In March 2016, the GRU began hacking the email accounts of Clinton Campaign volunteers and employees, including campaign chairman John Podesta. Since no investigative body was ever given access to the DNC servers how was this determined to be an act of "hacking" by the GRU?
A report by 'Crowd Strike' is hardly qualifying evidence.

Secondly, Podesta's email wasn't hacked. That man fell for a phishing trick and he opened the door to his own emails.

If this is atypical of the rest of this report it was all a waste of time and money.

58 posted on 04/18/2019 9:27:00 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger
Page 36 illustrates that the difference between hacking and phishing, or spearphishing as it's defined in footnote 112, is a known concept and should have been applied appropriately regarding Podesta's email.

Podesta was never hacked!

66 posted on 04/18/2019 9:41:03 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson