Posted on 04/17/2019 12:48:11 PM PDT by Red Badger
Like most liberals youre trying to move the goal posts when your treachery is exposed.
What treachery? In detail, please?
YOU started this by asserting you would pay attention when indictments happen.
I said no such thing. This is what I said...
When I see that an investigation has been opened into these "threats" then I'll believe him. Until then...meh!
Ive had two people criminally charged in the last 10 days.
What about the other 57 threats? meh!
THAT is what I said. I said nothing about indictments. And you claim I'm changing the goalposts?
I stand by what I said. This could be a hoax, just like many of the others in the news of late.
So to the meat...
...cannot understand that OUR President may just have told him (and others) to hold their fire until the right devastating time, like when the complete exoneration frees them up to go after the criminals aiding and abetting the high crimes.
You actually believe/think that POTUS would tell someone not to take action against somebody making death threats?
PLEASE! He takes real threats against himself/his own family seriously so why wouldn't he take real threats against another seriously and why wouldn't want it investigated immediately?
You stretch believability with such a postulation.
You posted your first effort to erase your perfidy, not the original 'meh'.
Here, let me post it for you, liar:
To: Red Badger
When I see that an investigation has been opened into these "threats" then I'll believe him. Until then...meh!
('cause believe you me if somebody threatened me or mine in such a manner I would damn sure go to the authorities with it and demand that it be investigated)4 posted on 4/17/2019 4:10:50 PM by philman_36
I like the cut of his jib. Anytime you're tempted to just move on, remember the lives that were made hell for political gain by RATs.
I posted both of my previous comments, sans my comment in parenthesis, as is plainly seen. Look at my reply 22 again and you will see two links, not just one, including, in your words, the original 'meh'.
Nonetheless, I made no mention of indictments as you indicated (which you now seem to be glossy over by neither mentioning or correcting your own misstatement).
I made mention of an investigation...which I even highlighted in bold for you to see it more clearly in reply 22...which also came from, in your words, the original 'meh' comment.
You're proving to be the liar, not me.
Perhaps you should spend some time looking into not bearing false witness
as your perspective and discernment on this are both highly skewed for some reason.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.