[Leaning Right]

It seems a bit early to rule out arson. So take yer pick:

A. Some worker has already admitted that he screwed up.
B. It might be arson. But the French cops don't want to tip their hand.
C. They want it to be an accident. So it's going to be an accident.

[NormsRevenge]

Get Inspector Clouseau’s cousin on it.. maybe ‘climate change’ in EUrabia is worsening.

[grobdriver]

have ruled out arson and potential terror-related motives

Quick work, there.

[SERKIT]

Accidental? Arson? Many of us had a "hunch" it was Quasimodo.

[Revel]

They are admitting bias in an investigation. If it were a real investigation then they would have no opinion at this time. This tells us that the entire investigation is a sham. They have already determined what the final report must say.

[1Old Pro]

Let’s get a list of names associated with the work crews or anyone with that kind of access. Then I’ll let you know.

[Teacher317]

"No workers onsite. Who tf is this?"
pic.twitter.com/OPYFFMxkRf
Vernon (@TipsyPianoBar)

Video of apparently Islamic person walking around Notre Dame as it burns.

The renovation crew clocked out at 530pm. The first alarm went off at 620pm, and was dismissed. The second alarm went off at 645pm. How was this a renovation crew mistake again?

[Verginius Rufus]

Yes, they want it to be an accident because they are afraid of the consequences if it should turn out that a Muslim started the fire.

We are supposed to believe it was an accident, just like the attack in Benghazi on 9/11 in 2012 was caused by a video.

[lightman]

Of course.

The ROP would, never, ever, even think of doing something like that.

/s

[YogicCowboy]

To be fair:

Historians today ignore the raison d’etre of the Crusades.