Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Crown of Thorns, Artwork Saved From Notre Dame Blaze
Breitbart ^ | 4/15/2019 | Joshua Caplan

Posted on 04/15/2019 7:47:59 PM PDT by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: sparklite2

I doubt you have any idea of the history of the crown of thorns, of the Sainte Chapelle, or of Notre Dame. You seem to enjoy casting doubts out of hand.


41 posted on 04/15/2019 10:48:22 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

You may admire him but I do not.


42 posted on 04/15/2019 10:51:49 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

I never heard of it before today. What I learned, I learned from sources like Wikipedia. I formed my opinion there, not ‘out of hand.’


43 posted on 04/15/2019 10:52:15 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

I’m sorry but I find your comments laughable.


44 posted on 04/15/2019 11:58:35 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Protestants and Catholics have been fighting about relics since before Luther.


45 posted on 04/16/2019 3:35:28 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors (at the time of election!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

‘I prefer to give weight to the probability the relic is real rather than dismiss it out of hand...and very rudely by you, I wish to state.’

however rude he may have been (I’d say flippant, instead), he is correct in his point; the burden of proving a claim lies with the claimant, not with the skeptic...


46 posted on 04/16/2019 3:40:37 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: proust

And your Uncle Jack and his horse; too!


47 posted on 04/16/2019 4:30:53 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
So, please tell us what makes YOU certain that this is ‘not the real crown of thorns’.

1. Logic

2. Why save it when placing the cloths around Jesus' head?

3. It was a mocking insult at the time.

4. How long does it take before the FIRST 'relic' shows up in the record?

5. the 'Shroud of Turin' does not show it. (I just tossed this other 'relic' in here for effect.)

48 posted on 04/16/2019 4:36:34 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
I’m glad anything that was saved, was saved, even if they aren’t real.

Kinda like Rome telling it's members that they can believe the alleged words of an apparition; even if it ain't Mary.

49 posted on 04/16/2019 4:38:53 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
I’m sure they have research and studies to back their claim.

Then I am sure that a faithful Catholic in this thread will produce a link or two to such evidence.


Has this bag been under your control all the while you've been here in the airport?

50 posted on 04/16/2019 4:45:19 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

I can call myself ignorant; for I know that it merely means that I am unknowledgeable about something or other.

Once the facts of the matter are shown to me; I am no longer ‘ignorant’.

Now STUPID means something else. Like I am incapable of learning or retaining data. Or willfully reject it.


51 posted on 04/16/2019 4:51:51 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
... it obviously is old and has a long history behind it and is worthy of respect.

What?

The mere AGE of something gives it respect?

52 posted on 04/16/2019 4:53:12 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1
I prefer to give weight to the probability the relic is real …

Of course you do; as it is something that you've been taught to value.

I just wonder how the ODDS are calculated.

53 posted on 04/16/2019 4:54:45 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Daily Mail had an article on some of the items rescued. The Crown of Thorns had the thorns removed quite some time ago and given to churches around the world. A piece of the True Cross was also at ND. I have not heard if it was rescued or not.


54 posted on 04/16/2019 4:55:25 AM PDT by mware (RETIRED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1
I am sure the Grand Louis didn’t throw his money away without some extremely convincing evidence that the relic he acquired was authentic.

All classes of people get conned every day.

I've heard of an Emperor that had some new clothes...

55 posted on 04/16/2019 4:55:58 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1
You seem to enjoy casting doubts out of hand.

And there are others who'll accept stories without needing to see any evidence.


Why do we lie to our children about Santa bringing them stuff?

'Cause they don't KNOW any better.

It keeps them in line (for a while).

56 posted on 04/16/2019 4:58:16 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mware

I see your point.


57 posted on 04/16/2019 4:59:34 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Well, there’s always Maslow’s trapeze. You never know what could be missing.


58 posted on 04/16/2019 4:59:34 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Logic

Merely posting the word does not make a logical argument.

It was a mocking insult at the time.

So was everything else about the crucifixion. That's kind of the point. Yet -- as I will sing at the beginning of Holy Thursday Mass in two days -- "We, however, ought to GLORY in the Cross of Our Lord Jesus Christ, in whom is our life and resurrection ..." (paraphrase of Gal 6:14).

the 'Shroud of Turin' does not show it

The shroud certainly shows the wounds of the thorns around the head. The crown was obviously removed before burial. The crown itself is mentioned explicitly in Scripture, as I'm sure you know.

59 posted on 04/16/2019 5:07:34 AM PDT by Campion ((marine dad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mware
The Crown of Thorns had the thorns removed quite some time ago and given to churches around the world.
A piece of the True Cross was also at ND.


Crown of Thorns, the wreath of thorns was placed on the head of Jesus Christ at his crucifixion, whereby the Roman soldiers mocked his title of “King of the Jews.”
A relic purported to be the Crown of Thorns was transferred from Jerusalem to Constantinople by 1063.
The French king Louis IX (St. Louis) took the relic to Paris about 1238 and had the Sainte-Chapelle built (1242–48) to house it.
The thornless remains are kept in the treasury at Notre-Dame Cathedral in Paris.
 
 
 
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Crown-of-Thorns-religious-relic
 
 
 
 
 
 
True Cross, Christian relic, reputedly the wood of the cross on which Jesus Christ was crucified.
Legend relates that the True Cross was found by St. Helena, mother of Constantine the Great,
during her pilgrimage to the Holy Land about 326.
 

The earliest historical reference to veneration of the True Cross occurs in the mid-4th century. By the 8th century the accounts were enriched by legendary details describing the history of the wood of the cross before it was used for the Crucifixion.

Adoration of the True Cross gave rise to the sale of its fragments which were sought as relics. John Calvin pointed out that all the extant fragments, if put together, would fill a large ship, an objection regarded as invalid by some Roman Catholic theologians who claimed that the blood of Christ gave to the True Cross a kind of material indestructibility, so that it could be divided indefinitely without being diminished. Such beliefs resulted in the multiplication of relics of the True Cross wherever Christianity expanded in the medieval world, and fragments were deposited in most of the great cities and in a great many abbeys. Reliquaries designed to hold the fragments likewise multiplied, and some precious objects of this kind survive.

 
 
 

60 posted on 04/16/2019 5:09:03 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson