Posted on 04/09/2019 3:59:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
The speed of digital advancements is what drives our economy. Since President Donald Trump took office, America has enjoyed an economic boom, with astonishingly low unemployment numbers and record capital investments in new technology that would have once seemed like science fiction.
With our smartphones and wireless data plans, more workers can telecommute today than ever before. This technology advances at lightning speed, which is why America is currently in a race with China and other countries to have a robust 5G network. This would require a massive infrastructure investment to build a network that offers previously impossible connectivity speeds - over 100 Mbps - over cellular wireless.
T-Mobile is one company who is pledging to build an impressive 5G network while hiring thousands of workers in the process, and they need to merge with Sprint to remain competitive. However, as expected in the Washington, D.C. swamp, some groups are working to block the proposed merger between Sprint and T-Mobile by spreading blatant falsehoods.
One of those groups is the Communications Workers of America (CWA).
Before a recent House Judiciary Subcommittee hearing on the merger, CWA President Christopher Shelton testified that "the merger of T-Mobile and Sprint will eliminate 30,000 jobs across the country…", including retail jobs and headquarter employees.
It’s a false claim CWA has been peddling for some time and nothing could be further from the truth!
In response, Sprint’s Executive Chairman, Marcelo Claure, fired back at Shelton in the hearing saying “it is crazy to say that we [Sprint] are going to fire 30,000 people. Sprint has 28,000 people. Do the math.”
Mr. Shelton also claimed “in recent years, T-Mobile has been the subject of more unfair labor practice charges per employee than any other big business in the United States,” while making similar accusations against Sprint.
This is ironic considering National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) data shows CWA itself has had more than 700 unfair labor practice charges filed against it between 2011 and 2018.
In 2018, T-Mobile didn’t receive any unfair labor practice charges, while more than 70 charges were attributed to CWA. The truth is, T-Mobile has a solid labor record. If CWA really cared about the welfare of its members, it would not have engaged in this smear campaign.
So, why is CWA against this merger? After all, they supported the most recent merger between AT&T and Time-Warner, even despite the Justice Department's concerns about the size and scope of the $85 billion acquisition from America's second largest wireless provider.
The answer is simple: CWA is “contractually obligated” to support AT&T, as Mr. Claure said during the hearing.
As reported last month, a contract between CWA and AT&T requires the union to support AT&T’s business objectives, including legislative agenda, with the agreement between the two entities saying "the Union hereby agrees to continue its support before the appropriate regulatory and legislative bodies for the Company's efforts to remain competitive in, and/or gain entry to, all telecommunications and related markets." And, if CWA disagrees with AT&T’s positions, they can do so “provided it gives AT&T advanced notice.”
America is no doubt in a tough fight to win the global race to 5G. Both T-Mobile and Sprint have repeatedly laid out why this merger will help America get there first, from better wireless internet service and major infrastructure spending to countless new high-tech jobs. To keep the Trump economy strong and growing, and to help America stay competitive technologically, we must reject the fear and demagoguery coming from the small chorus that is trying to derail this effort.
It is clear that CWA is doing AT&T’s dirty work to try and block this merger because if they weren’t, Mr. Shelton would be more interested in talking about facts, instead of funny math that doesn’t add up.
Since the mid-20th Century, unions have only been obstacles to freedom and progress.
As a 30 year telco vet I can attest to the fact that The CWA Sucks and only cares about the CWA
Enforcing the Beck Decision would end this foolishness and probably the CWA as well.
L
I know guys who belong to this union who are most unhappy that they keep getting called out on worthless strikes.
AT&T was not a real player in our area with old stuff hanging on old poles.
AT&T was a terrible company to deal with and we left their old and out dated system about 10 years ago and went to Comcast.
After the first year Comcast became more like AT&T with price increases every 6 months.
So we cut our Comcast cable 3 years ago. Ironically the best internet deal was with Comcast Business. It had the fastest and a more reliable system than AT&T and the old Comcast system. The cost for a fast internet and 2 phones is a little over $100/month.
We are saving over $200 per month with a faster and more reliable internet versus the normal Comcast package.
Now this:
“As reported last month, a contract between CWA and AT&T requires the union to support AT&T’s business objectives, including legislative agenda, with the agreement between the two entities saying “the Union hereby agrees to continue its support before the appropriate regulatory and legislative bodies for the Company’s efforts to remain competitive in, and/or gain entry to, all telecommunications and related markets.” And, if CWA disagrees with AT&T’s positions, they can do so “provided it gives AT&T advanced notice.”
America is no doubt in a tough fight to win the global race to 5G. Both T-Mobile and Sprint have repeatedly laid out why this merger will help America get there first, from better wireless internet service and major infrastructure spending to countless new high-tech jobs. To keep the Trump economy strong and growing, and to help America stay competitive technologically, we must reject the fear and demagoguery coming from the small chorus that is trying to derail this effort.
It is clear that CWA is doing AT&T’s dirty work to try and block this merger because if they weren’t, Mr. Shelton would be more interested in talking about facts, instead of funny math that doesn’t add up.”
No AT&T in our future with the above.
The title of the article is very mis leading. Sounds like the union is the one being attacked.
I do not want T-Mobile to merge with Sprint. I want to break up the phone companies and the media companies.
We need competition.
Agreed!
I think many companies start up with the sole purpose of selling out or merging with a bigger company. It's all the entrepreneurial spirit: hope for profit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.