Posted on 04/05/2019 10:40:41 AM PDT by fishtank
A few additional, well placed, nouns and verbs would make your post more decipherable.
“asserting that our evolutionary ancestors did not hold to the modern traditional binary male and female gender roles”
Our “evolutionary ancestors” also left infants with birth defects out in the wilderness to die, and indulged in mass rape, slavery, and cannibalism whenever the opportunity presented itself.
Not sure they are the best role models.
Scientism, c. 1975+: Nature does not care about subjective emotions like love. Nature only cares about spreading genes in the population through binary sexual copulation.
Scientism, c. 2015+: Nature does not care about objective realities like sex. Nature only cares about spreading love in the culture through multifarious gender eroticism.
Oh for the days when the women were strong, the men were good looking, and all the children were slightly above average.
(Garrison Keiller)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.