Skip to comments.
Jussie Smollett won't reimburse Chicago's investigation costs; city vows civil suit
Fox News ^
| Apr. 4, 2019
| Mariah Haas
Posted on 04/04/2019 6:28:26 PM PDT by Innovative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
He got away scot-free and instead of being glad and happily pay the cost, he is refusing it.
They should get him for everything they can.
To: Innovative
Make Kim Foxx pay for it.
2
posted on
04/04/2019 6:30:05 PM PDT
by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
To: Innovative
The chances of the new mayor following through with this is right up there with the chance that Morgan Fairchild will knocking on my door this evening
3
posted on
04/04/2019 6:31:19 PM PDT
by
digger48
To: digger48
Why would you want him knocking on your door?
4
posted on
04/04/2019 6:33:12 PM PDT
by
Fungi
To: Innovative
Since he’s claiming innocence this is the right thing to do.
Paying them would be admitting guilt.
(yes, I know he’s not innocent)
5
posted on
04/04/2019 6:35:38 PM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(The internet has driven the world mad.)
To: Fungi
Morgan Fairchild is a “she” and is an actress.
To: Innovative
the city doesn’t have a leg to stand on ... they failed to charge this miscreant for a single crime, so he doesn’t owe them a cent ... charging citizens for their investigation is something out of the old soviet union or even a franz kafka story ...
7
posted on
04/04/2019 6:36:02 PM PDT
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: SaxxonWoods
Legally speaking , this is confusing.
Legally speaking, he’s off the hook, he’s scot free.
Since he’s off the hook, legally, and since legally, he did nothing wrong, then why, legally, would there be an expectation that he reimburse for the investigative costs?
To: Dilbert San Diego
Different standard in civil court. Think Goldman case against OJ.
9
posted on
04/04/2019 6:38:41 PM PDT
by
RummyChick
(I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
To: Innovative
What a loathsome creature he is.
10
posted on
04/04/2019 6:39:08 PM PDT
by
KC_Lion
(If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
To: Innovative
FULLY EXONERATED!
At least if you listen to Leftists.
11
posted on
04/04/2019 6:39:22 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: KC_Lion
He was a red diaper baby, Communist parents. Odds were against him, and he certainly didnt overcome the odds.
12
posted on
04/04/2019 6:40:39 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: Innovative
13
posted on
04/04/2019 6:40:46 PM PDT
by
Vlad The Inhaler
(Give me Norfolk Virginia TideWater4-1009 The poor Boy Is On The Line)
To: Dilbert San Diego
I still don’t want him knocking on my door.
14
posted on
04/04/2019 6:42:19 PM PDT
by
Fungi
To: Vlad The Inhaler
Has he dated Malaria or Sharia?
To: Innovative
16
posted on
04/04/2019 6:43:19 PM PDT
by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
To: Fungi
17
posted on
04/04/2019 6:43:39 PM PDT
by
Bob434
To: Innovative
Where are the Feds on the investigation of the threat letter?
18
posted on
04/04/2019 6:43:43 PM PDT
by
Truth29
To: Dilbert San Diego
.
Was thinking of this guy. Wrong name.
19
posted on
04/04/2019 6:45:03 PM PDT
by
Fungi
To: Dilbert San Diego
I agree, on what basis are they trying to charge him?
When has this ever been tried before?
20
posted on
04/04/2019 6:45:05 PM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(The internet has driven the world mad.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson