Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP triggers 'nuclear option' to speed up Trump picks
The Hill ^ | April 3, 2019 | Jordain Carney

Posted on 04/03/2019 1:15:59 PM PDT by jazusamo

Senate Republicans deployed the “nuclear option” on Wednesday to drastically reduce the amount of time it takes to confirm hundreds of President Trump’s nominees.

Senators voted 51-48 to change the rules for the amount of time it takes to confirm most executive nominations with only a simple majority of the chamber. GOP Sens. Mike Lee (Utah) and Susan Collins (Maine) joined with Democrats in opposing the rules change.

Republicans are expected to trigger the “nuclear option” for a second time later Wednesday to force through the same change for district court nominations.

The combined actions will result in most nominations that require Senate confirmation needing only two hours of debate after they’ve defeated a filibuster that shows they have the votes to ultimately be confirmed. Before Wednesday’s rules change they faced up to an additional 30 hours of debate.

Supreme Court picks, appeals court judges and Cabinet nominees will not be affected by the rules change and will still face the lengthier Senate floor debate.

But the move will let Republicans hit the gas on confirming nominations, a top priority in an era of divided government that has left lawmakers without big-ticket legislative agenda items.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) argued shortly before triggering the hardball procedural tactic that the Senate needed to go back to a “more normal and reasonable process” for confirming nominations.

“Our colleagues across the aisle have chosen to endlessly relitigate the 2016 election rather than actually participate in governing,” McConnell added. “This problem goes deeper than today. We’re talking about the future of this very institution and the future functioning of our constitutional government.

Republicans have set a record for the number of appeals judges confirmed during an administration’s first two years, but they’ve accused Democrats of using the chamber’s legislative rulebook to slow down lower-level executive and judicial nominations.

Of 715 “key positions” tracked by The Washington Post and the Partnership for Public Service, 435 have been confirmed by the Senate. An additional 131 are awaiting confirmation, 12 need to be formally nominated and 140 positions still need nominations.

And, according to the same tracker, some departments still have substantial vacancies in their Senate-confirmed positions.

The Interior Department, for example, has 41 percent of its Senate-confirmed employees in place, the Justice Department has 48 percent and the Department of Labor has 50 percent.

It’s the second time Republicans have gone “nuclear” to make it easier to confirm Trump’s nominees in as many years. In 2017, Republicans nixed the 60-vote filibuster on Supreme Court nominees, mirroring the action Democrats took in 2013 on lower-court and executive nominees.

Republicans made a last-ditch effort on Tuesday to pass the rules change as a standing order, which would have required 60 votes. But Democrats and Lee voted against the resolution, preventing it from getting the necessary support to pass.

The resolution was widely expected to fail the earlier test vote but was aimed at assuaging concerns from within the GOP caucus about moving forward with the nuclear option without at least trying to pass it with Democrats. The caucus held a meeting on Tuesday evening to walk through the plan for Wednesday.

“I think we had to convince 51, at least 51, of our members that we’re doing everything possible to try to do this through regular order,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) about the point of Tuesday’s vote.

Republicans say they reached out to try to negotiate an agreement with Democrats to try to reach a deal to avoid Wednesday’s floor drama but found little interest. Sources familiar with the negotiations told The Hill last week that Democrats have tried to negotiate a deal with McConnell, with suggested changes such as postponing the rules change until 2021, applying it only to executive nominees or restoring the “blue slip” for circuit court picks but were unable to reach an agreement.

Democrats are bristling over Republicans decision to invoke the “nuclear option,” arguing that they can’t simultaneously complain about the pace of nominations while setting a record for some court nominees.

A similar resolution passed the Senate in 2013 that cut debate time for most executive nominations to eight hours and district judges to two hours. But that resolution, which passed with bipartisan support, only controlled the 113th Congress.

Democrats argue that the dynamic around nominations has changed dramatically since then. Democrats nixed the 60-vote filibuster in 2013 for most nominations and Republicans followed suite in 2017 on Supreme Court nominations.

Republicans have also moved circuit nominations over the objections of home-state senators.

“The way my colleagues on the other side talk about the issue, you’d think Democrats delayed every nominee for as long as possible. That just doesn’t remotely resemble the truth,” said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 116th; braking; constitutionaloption; debatetime; leadermcconnell; nuclearoption; slamdunk; trumpjudges; trumpjudiciary; trumpnominees; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
Good, it's finally done.
1 posted on 04/03/2019 1:15:59 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s the only way to be sure.


2 posted on 04/03/2019 1:16:40 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Did they borrow one of Pelosi’s testicles?


3 posted on 04/03/2019 1:17:05 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

About 24 months too late


4 posted on 04/03/2019 1:17:45 PM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Good they finally did it.

Better late, than never.


5 posted on 04/03/2019 1:18:10 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
GOP Sens. Mike Lee (Utah) and Susan Collins (Maine) joined with Democrats in opposing the rules change.

Wait, what, Romney supported this and Lee didn't?

6 posted on 04/03/2019 1:18:55 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It will never pass.


7 posted on 04/03/2019 1:19:20 PM PDT by JoSixChip (Trump stands alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

What is wrong with Lee? Why vote against this? It makes no sense.


8 posted on 04/03/2019 1:19:29 PM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I know Mitch is a RINO ass*ole but he knows how to rally the troops to get things done. This must be the “exchange” with PDJT regarding “keep obamacare alive” from yesterday..


9 posted on 04/03/2019 1:19:42 PM PDT by max americana (Fired libtards at our company for the past 12 yrs at every election. I hope all liberals die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I’m sure there was a deal in place to get Mutt on board. What that deal is, it’s gonna hurt Trump because Smitch and Linda Graham are totally onboard on this issue..

In hindsight, the judges will help the country in the long term even when we have a Dummycrat prez in the future.


10 posted on 04/03/2019 1:21:30 PM PDT by max americana (Fired libtards at our company for the past 12 yrs at every election. I hope all liberals die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks jazusamo.

11 posted on 04/03/2019 1:22:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

MAGA!

Support Free Republic, Folks! Donate today!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

12 posted on 04/03/2019 1:22:38 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

“Wait, what, Romney supported this and Lee didn’t?”

Maybe they just automatically count Romney with the Dhims.


13 posted on 04/03/2019 1:22:48 PM PDT by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s not a rule change, it’s a change of precedent.

The Hill doesn’t care- as long as an article gets some knocks in on Republicans they’ve done their job.


14 posted on 04/03/2019 1:24:18 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

I’m guessing Trump cut a deal. He backed off shuting down the border for this probably.


15 posted on 04/03/2019 1:25:15 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

It already passed.


16 posted on 04/03/2019 1:25:43 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

“It will never pass.”

it just did: that’s what the article is about ... Senate rule changes require only a majority vote ...


17 posted on 04/03/2019 1:31:45 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

What is wrong with Lee? Why vote against this? It makes no sense.

//////
Lee would have been thinking of payback.

In the future when the senate shifts control to democrats—the republicans will be under the same regime that they created. they will not be able to slow walk democrat nominations for the lower courts or the executive


18 posted on 04/03/2019 1:32:02 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Could be. Smitch is a deep state POS RINO and he wont do anything for the country unless he has something to gain..


19 posted on 04/03/2019 1:34:30 PM PDT by max americana (Fired libtards at our company for the past 12 yrs at every election. I hope all liberals die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I have no words for pathetic Susan Collins.


20 posted on 04/03/2019 1:34:44 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson