To: Mr.Unique
I think the 12A is clear...
The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;--The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed...
I don't see the discretion to just vote against the people and change the system. The spirit of the law was specifically against a simple popular vote. It doesn't have to be spelled out "no popular vote" or "each State can vote based on how other States vote". In fact they're specifically not allowed to enter agreements with each other without Congress - as spelled out by others.
86 posted on
04/01/2019 8:14:28 AM PDT by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: fuzzylogic
I think the 12A is clear...
It is, but it doesn't prohibit NPV allocation by States.
104 posted on
04/01/2019 10:35:48 AM PDT by
Mr.Unique
(The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson