Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
This was an unfortunate and unnecessary situation but let’s face it. People doing dumb things often generate dumb consequences. Nowhere is there any sensible explanation for this couple not just doing the right thing for their kid in the first place..
49 posted on 03/30/2019 6:43:24 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard (Power is more often surrendered than seized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard; Wuli; Reno89519
I think I have struck the perfect balance in this previous message:

While the family reacted poorly, I still do not see the need for a SWAT-style raid. This is just more of the military-mentality of the police.

And for that matter, if the child WAS in jeopardy, would it not have been simple enough to state, through the door, that because of the situation and the awareness of law enforcement, that if the child dies or is injured, that the parents WILL be prosecuted for Manslaughter or Child Abuse, respectively? Then just leave it be.

In fact, you could simply state that failure to allow the child to be looked at could violate Child Endangerment laws, also resulting in a warrant and prosecution.

Anyone reasonable would give in under that legal threat, and anyone unreasonable needs to be charged anyways.

The SWAT-raid is unreasonable on society’s part, and thus, my issue.

Hammers/Nails.

Reno89519, you were pinged because I reviewed last night's thread and you were firmly on the side of the State. I think this is a reasonable compromise, don't you?

54 posted on 03/30/2019 6:48:31 AM PDT by Lazamataz (McCain's passing ended up being + 2 net Republican Senators. Him, and Lindsey Graham.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson