My logic is fine. I made no assumptions. The mother had sought medical care when the child was ill. The child’s fever had broken after being seen by the doctor. So we know
A. The mom was not adverse to seeking medical care.
B. The child got better.
I conclude that if the child had remained ill for a good while after seeing the doctor the mother would have gone to the ER. That she didn’t shows me that the child recovered somewhat quickly. Which toddlers do. And again why didn’t the doctor call for an ambulance if she believed the child could very well have a life threatening illness?
May I suggest to you take at least an introductory in logic at a college, if you’re able to matriculate, that is.
Upon successful completion I suggest you also take a “Critical Thinking” class at the 200 level to learn key cognitive skills.
It will take some honest work to eventually become proficient, but I know you can do it.
Good luck!