To: Petrosius
I’d sue for DNA to determine the x-y chromosomes. That would prove his claim of calling the person a biological male.
4 posted on
03/29/2019 6:00:03 AM PDT by
ealgeone
To: ealgeone
Well, it is our colony to the north, Canada, so I guess we just laugh. Don't laugh. They have plans to do the same thing here; the First Amendment be damned.
7 posted on
03/29/2019 6:02:19 AM PDT by
Petrosius
To: ealgeone
Remove medication for a few months and see what emerges. /sarc
16 posted on
03/29/2019 6:22:57 AM PDT by
ptsal
To: ealgeone
Like the “judge” said...Truth don’t matter.....
25 posted on
03/29/2019 6:33:34 AM PDT by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
To: ealgeone
That wouldn't make any difference.
Tribunal judge Devyn Cousineau, however, ruled “the ‘truth’ of the statements in the flyer is not a defense.”
31 posted on
03/29/2019 6:49:43 AM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: ealgeone
Obviously proof would be ineffective, and has been ruled inadmissable in this court.
Plugged ears singing lalalalallala...
Incredible.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson