That seems to indicate Mueller found evidence of behavior that was at least in the general ballpark of obstruction — even if Barr and Rosenstein concluded the evidence was not strong enough to sustain a criminal case. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Obstruction like PDJT calling the Mueller Investigation a witch-hunt? The president was telling the truth.Thats not obstruction.
“Obstruction like PDJT calling the Mueller Investigation a witch-hunt?”
yes and more. To these asswipes whenever The President ( I love saying that when Trump is in office) said he was innocent of any wrong doing, they said that was obstruction because he was signaling to drop the case. Notice that Barr took great lengths to explain he did not obstruct not even considering whether a sitting President could be indicted. IOW, not only was there no obstruction, even if there were, he could not be indicted anyway. Mueller and his band of hombres could not bring themselves to just say there was insufficient evidence to charge obstruction when in fact that is exactly what they were saying in a round about fashion.
There can be no “obstruction” if there was no crime. Barr made that point in the letter.