“He has no legal standing to determine that he doesn’t have to answer a subpoena because it relates to a “fishing expedition.””
He sure does. He can decide that this is a fishing expedition and one of it’s goals is to look for a way to prosecute him. That is pure 5th amendment. Laughable to think HE has no legal standing to decide.
Of course he can invoke his Fifth Amendment rights. He can't invoke his Fifth Amendment rights to protect someone else -- which is exactly what he says he is doing here.
No wonder this guy is being prosecuted. He's got a big mouth that isn't connected to his brain, apparently.