Poor Darwin’s been gone for a long time and still can’t catch a break.
Why doesn’t fishtank’s crew pick on something more modern like comparative genomics?
Wander over to Vox Day's site. You can read about how the chimp genome isn't 98% correlated with the human: a lot of the stretches of the genome were never captured in the first place, so it was "assumed" that the human genome was a good scaffolding as it were to approximate unknown stretches; and there turns out to be significant human DNA presence in the DNA samples of most other critters, because of sloppy lab technique (e.g sneezing holding a sample vial, fingerprints, etc. etc.)
Because (raises eyebrows) Science.
Why?
Why is a Darwinist even on FreeRepublic?