Posted on 03/18/2019 5:37:32 PM PDT by Revel
A source with intimate knowledge of the situation is claiming two Fox News hosts secretly maneuvered to get Judge Jeanine Pirro suspended over her controversial remarks about Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), with one, Bret Baier, allegedly seeking to curry favor with Democrats to reverse a decision to not allow Fox to host any of the partys presidential primary debates by getting Fox to suspend Pirro.
he original complaint came from Bret Baiers team. Bret saw an opportunity to make Fox News acceptable enough to the left, so he could get himself a job of hosting the Democratic Debates. Bret instructed one of his producers, Hufsa Kamal, to tweet a condemnation of Judge Jeanine to put pressure on Fox News to suspend her show.
Shepard Smith, known as a never-Trumper, also played a major role in the Judges suspension. He lobbied 24/7 to suspend her.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Brtett Baer=Chris Wall Ass just another DBM wannabe.
Kristinn is an excellent sourced and has been a long time Freeper.
We need to go after sponsors its all that will get their attention.
Personal injury lawsuit, not against Fox. Difficult to prove, but should be used to attack the the Leftists whenever possible.
Maybe all that deserves a second hard look if there is anything left to find.....
____________________
He learned well under this smirking scumbag ....
Fox is CNN with lipstick.
I don’t think it matters who is responsible for everything. Judge Pirro asked a question. One that any honest journalist/host/reporter should ask, especially in light of the things that Omar, and her friends, have said. But, Hey, who cares about that stuff?
I agree. My wife asked me what did Jeanine do? I said she did what it is her job to do, ask questions and set out logical points to consider. Cannot do it today because if you ask questions embarrassing to the sacred cows, you are headed for a fall. I hope this comes back to bite them in the ass but it will not unfortunately. We have gone full USSR now in what we do here now.
“I never liked Bret Baier.”
He reminds me of Eddie Munster
“There is circumstantial evidence.”
Not really.
There is only cause for suspicion. That’s it.
“I bet you think Twitter is fair to everyone”
Why did you say this?
Do you believe it contributes to your argument? Does it somehow enhance your position?
Or does it just cover your own shortcomings?
Totally speculation but here is what I think is happening at FAUX.
1. The Murdoch boys, who are taking over more of the management, are getting crap from their SJW wives to “soften” Faux to be more like CNN.
2. To that end, they have allowed harassment claims to do the job they really wanted to do-—eliminate O’Reilly, Bollling, perhaps now Judy Jeanine.
3. There is an inner coup by Mr. Mascara, Shep and Baier Aspirin to grab control. To do so they have to get rid of Tucker, Laura, Lou, and finally Sean.
Apparently, one of Brett’s producers is a foreign born muslim who hates conservatives.
If she wants to keep her job, she can’t say anything. She probably cannot make what she is making now, at any other network (since the biggies would never hire her).
Hufsa Kamal. Uh huh.
Fox News host Howard Kurtz mentioned her.
Post #33. Wow. I would love to see the full video of that exchange.
“Ever wonder why Bret Baiers camera shots are all of him above midchest” -— Why?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.