To: TangoLimaSierra
.
Should read 100 acre-feet/sec.
.
25 posted on
03/18/2019 11:18:10 AM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: editor-surveyor
26 posted on
03/18/2019 11:20:11 AM PDT by
TangoLimaSierra
(To the Left, The truth is Right Wing Extremism.)
To: editor-surveyor
That still sounds high. 32.6 million gallons per second?
123 posted on
03/18/2019 5:43:09 PM PDT by
ecomcon
To: TangoLimaSierra; editor-surveyor
Should read 100 acre-feet/sec. That would be about three times more water than the Mississippi and Columbia Rivers combined. Sorry but I rather doubt that 100 acre feet per second is not correct. The actual figure is 100,000 CFS
126 posted on
03/18/2019 6:31:23 PM PDT by
Colorado Doug
(Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson