Posted on 03/14/2019 7:47:33 AM PDT by ETL
On reflection, you are correct about Rush.
In 2017, Pelosi revealed a shady tried-and-true Democrat demonization tactic called the wrap-up smear.
PELOSI: We call it the wrap-up smear. You smear somebody, with falsehoods and all the rest, and then you merchandise
it to the media, Pelosi blithely said at a press conference.......as if she were giving out a recipe for apple pie.
SOUND FAMILIAR? This patented Democrat criminal MO was used against Justice Kavanaugh.
Is it okay if I pray for their comeuppance?
They tried to set Trump up with a Martha Stewart-like charge so that they could put him behind bars after Hillary was safely ensconced in the White House. Why? Just cuz as president she could. She would've had the entire Justice Department and the FBI to bear on Donald Trump.
He was not supposed to win. He was supposed to go to prison in absolute shame.
All that "collusion" stuff is a complete CYA act.
They didn't think about labelling it all "collusion" until Hillary lost and they were having to make it look like what they were doing with the FISA and the Russian lady at the Trump Tower as somehow Trump's fault.
Trump's son supposedly having a meeting with a Russian agent at Trump Tower is a huge frigging deal, but somehow Hillary doing quid pro quo giving away her influence, our Uranium and our national security is not that big a deal.
Wouldn't it be nice if the media began doing their jobs and reported correctly on the Uranium deal?
Hell, somebody at the Washington Post just may get a Pulitzer for the effort.
If Trump is as dangerous as they’ve been claiming, how can they NOT impeach?
lol
“There was no scientific reason to take the sample to them, so what other reason could there have been?”
There was no second ‘sample’. It was merely an excuse for Mueller to be the bag man for Hillary.
Maybe there was a second ‘sample’. However, it wasn’t of the original stolen uranium from Georgia, it was a sample of what Hillary was selling the Russians the ‘rights’ to.
Glenn Greenwald eats jihadi hamashole breakfast, lunch and dinner.
So she is now colluding with the Russians?
Yep, and I can picture a laughing Harry Reid saying, “well, it worked, didn’t it?”
While the mainstream news media hunts for evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, the public record shows that Democrats have willfully used Moscow disinformation to influence the presidential election against Donald Trump and attack his administration.
The disinformation came in the form of a Russian-fed dossier written by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele. It contains a series of unverified criminal charges against Mr. Trumps campaign aides, such as coordinating Moscows hacking of Democratic Party computers.
Some Democrats have widely circulated the discredited information. Mr. Steele was paid by the Democrat-funded opposition research firm Fusion GPS with money from a Hillary Clinton backer. Fusion GPS distributed the dossier among Democrats and journalists. The information fell into the hands of the FBI, which used it in part to investigate Mr. Trumps campaign aides.
Mr. Steele makes clear that his unproven charges came almost exclusively from sources linked to the Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin. He identified his sources as a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure, a former top level Russian intelligence officer active inside the Kremlin, a senior Kremlin official and a senior Russian government official.
The same Democrats who have condemned Russias election interference via plying fake news and hacking email servers have quoted freely from the Steele anti-Trump memos derived from creatures of the Kremlin.
In other words, there is public evidence of significant, indirect collusion between Democrats and Russian disinformation, a Trump supporter said. ...
Continued at source...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/11/democrats-spread-false-russian-information-on-trum/
Or,
That, and Feinstein questioned about military tribunals this week during a congressional hearing for a judge - don’t recall his name. She wanted to know his thoughts on Military vs civilian trials for domestic terrorism. He stated it would be inappropriate to answer, as he may have to hear some of those cases. Kavanaugh was questioned about military tribunals, as well.
This “Q” is looking more and more legit by the day.
Yup. They are trying to reclaim what tiny bit of integrity that they once had. They are hoping that it will play well in the upcoming elections.
Does this include the derogatory term “teabaggers?”
thanks! let’s make sure that stays viral!!
With the title:
More displays of fraud from Democrats
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/mar/13/in-a-display-of-democratic-fraud-nancy-pelosi-says/
Hot link
Thanks for correcting that. At work and I think I posted too quickly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.