[jmacusa]

As I said originally you lambast the modern democrat party as tou put it ‘tearing itself apart’’ and yet to venerate the democrat Party that gave this nation the Confederacy. And to drive home that point you have , in every one of your posts the picture of a man who took up arms against his own country in the service of men who had no problem owing another human being and was the first ‘’wizard’’ of one of, if not, America’s first hate group, the Ku Klux Klan and now you’re attempting some petting fogging nonsense cloaked in some phony intellectual discourse. let’s not lose sight of the fact, the South launched a war of violent secession and lost. Now how about answering the questions I put to you?

[zeestephen]

Re: “let’s not lose sight of the fact, the South launched a war of violent secession and lost.”

I think the South would have been quite pleased to accept a peaceful division of the country, but such a division was never offered.

Instead, President Lincoln decided that the South was perpetually bound to the United States.

When the South disagreed, Lincoln utterly destroyed the economy of the South, freed the slaves, gave them the right to vote - and just walked away.

What could possibly go wrong?

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

And, so all political history begins with your personal dislike for the Democrats, circa 1855?

Do you similarly viscerally dislike Thomas Jefferson...a Virginia Democrat?

[nathanbedford]

Now how about answering the questions I put to you?

I was frankly nonplussed to read your demand that I answer your questions that you put to me. So I went through your four or five replies to me on this thread and everywhere I saw a question mark I wrote down the question; here they are, such as they are:

Guess irony’s lost on you, huh?

As well as hypocrisy?

Seriously?

Really, you ARE serious?

What would America look like today?

What if the South had won?

I look at the questions and I ask, what is he asking? The first two are personal attacks which I choose to dismiss. The third, "seriously?" Is an empty rhetorical device as well as demeaning which I also choose to dismiss. Likewise the fourth, "Really, you ARE serious?".

The last two are what if questions and I am not inclined to play what if games with you today.

I not at all motivated to defend myself against the fatuous questions listed above.

Nor am I inclined to relitigate the war between the states. Equally am I disinclined to defend the use of my name and avatar beyond which has been thoroughly expressed in my about page, which I stand behind, every word.

You are getting tiresome. You are representative of a major problem today all conservatives must contend against, the incessant, rabid campaign to shut down free speech. Take a look at what's going on with Tucker Carlson. You are playing the same game Media Matters plays against him for something he said 10 years ago and both of you think the ends justify the means.