Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norski
This development would put a fascinating juxtaposition before the Supreme Court: a Texas state law expressly in support of an express right contained in the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment, juxtaposed against a California state law expressly in opposition to an exclusive area of federal responsibility, immigration.

The case would likely go rabidly to the Supreme Court, perhaps as a matter of original jurisdiction. The question would be how to set it up so that the leftist on the Supreme Court would be put in a position where their hypocrisy would be exposed in supporting sanctuary but opposing the Second Amendment.


16 posted on 03/12/2019 4:25:06 AM PDT by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

The left forced homosexual marriage nationwide by using the Constitution as a wedge. They legalized such marriages in Massachusetts and then sent those new couples around to sue for recognition of a lawful status in one state on all other states. Gun advocates should proceed likewise by having folks in highly permissive states move into restrictive ones, like Massachusetts, and sue for recognition of their lawfully permitted status.


23 posted on 03/12/2019 5:41:37 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

Did you really intend to say, “rabidly”?


43 posted on 03/12/2019 9:29:51 AM PDT by OKSooner (Green New Deal: "If you like your air conditioner you can keep your air conditioner.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson