Post #74, you said in full:
The argument IS rational, taxation without representation.What is not rational is letting them come in the first place.
Letting them in opens up a whole world of possibilities, as we see on almost a daily basis..
What were you saying there, and in your quote above?
Your position is that the 20 million+ illegal aliens that "live here and pay taxes" should get a say in representation here? I know that they shouldn't be here in the first place. That goes without saying. I know the liberals want the illegal aliens to vote, it also looks like that's what your advocating as well so long as they work and pay taxes here.
Mexican / Honduran / Chinese / Russian / Hungarian, etc citizens who have lived here illegally for 1 week, or 30+ years, STILL owe their complete allegiance to their foreign country...even IF they are paying taxes here.
Why would "taxation without representation" apply to them here? You think the framers and founders were advocating for such people to have influence in our government?
you keep bringing up short term residents ignoring my point about “permanent or long term.
I don’t think we have anything else to discuss.
I presented what is happening. When the next actions are taken to get illegals voting you will see I have identified their strategy correctly.