Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Roberts is voting with liberal justices, but he's not one of them
Washington Examiner ^ | March 08, 2019 12:03 AM | Melissa Quinn

Posted on 03/08/2019 7:38:37 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Chief Justice John Roberts’ recent votes with the liberal members of the Supreme Court have given rise to speculation he has become the court’s new swing vote, but court watchers say he has not suddenly moved to the Left.

Instead, the chief justice, 64, now sits at the middle of the court and is working to shield it from accusations the justices are politically motivated, they say.

Analysts characterize Roberts as an institutionalist who cares about protecting the Supreme Court’s reputation, and they note that while he has joined the liberal justices, his votes were primarily on procedural motions rather than the merits of the policies.

If issues like abortion, campaign finance, and affirmative action do come before the court, they don’t expect Roberts to offer any surprises.

“When the rubber hits the road,” Ilya Shapiro of the Cato Institute said, “his views are clear, and that’s not going to change.”

“I don’t think what we’ve seen so far is early evidence of Roberts moving to the left or evolving,” Shapiro said. “Nor is it Roberts becoming moderate like Kennedy, the true swing vote. It’s just Roberts trying to use his power at the margins with procedural things to shape what kinds of decisions the court ultimately does rule on.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
If it walks like a duck...
1 posted on 03/08/2019 7:38:37 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

2 posted on 03/08/2019 7:39:38 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (We are in the midst of a Cold Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If he votes with them, he’s one of them.

It’s what he votes that affects us, not *who he is*.


3 posted on 03/08/2019 7:41:30 AM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Someone ‘s got pics of him with a dead boy or a live goat.


4 posted on 03/08/2019 7:42:09 AM PST by MuttTheHoople
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Voting liberal on Obamacare was not a “procedural” vote.


5 posted on 03/08/2019 7:42:14 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

[[Instead, the chief justice, 64, now sits at the middle of the court and is working to shield it from accusations the justices are politically motivated, they say.]]]]

By becoming, a liberal.


6 posted on 03/08/2019 7:45:26 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

He is not there to protect the SC...he’s there to protect our constitution!!!!!!


7 posted on 03/08/2019 7:48:51 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I am more interested in hearing that he, Sotomayor, Kagan, and others are going to retire. I’d list Ginsberg but she’s made clear she’s staying until ‘death do us part’.


8 posted on 03/08/2019 7:49:15 AM PST by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I read that Roberts conservative rating is about halfway between Kennedy and Thomas. He’s been a disappointment a few times but hardly a liberal.


9 posted on 03/08/2019 7:50:07 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The “swing vote” on the Supreme Court is the most powerful man in America. The seduction of this power must be awfully hard to resist.


10 posted on 03/08/2019 7:50:25 AM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Instead, the chief justice, 64, now sits at the middle of the court and is working to shield it from accusations the justices are politically motivated, they say.

By voting as a partisan? I don't think so!

11 posted on 03/08/2019 7:51:25 AM PST by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

AS a famous coach once said, “You are what your record shows.”


12 posted on 03/08/2019 7:53:44 AM PST by crusher (GREEN: Globaloney for the Gullible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

More concerned about the Court’s reputation than he is about the Constitution.


13 posted on 03/08/2019 7:54:07 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham ("God is a spirit, and man His means of walking on the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum


14 posted on 03/08/2019 7:54:54 AM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Why waste your reputation, your life’s works defending and giving
resuscitation to a body involved in destruction.
Reviving such is unhelpful to anyone but Satan himself.


15 posted on 03/08/2019 7:55:36 AM PST by V K Lee ("VICTORY FOR THE RIGHTEOUS IS JUDGMENT FOR THE WICKED")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This article does not provide an adequate defense of Traitor Roberts’ votes of late.

Traitor Roberts is a Political Justice.


16 posted on 03/08/2019 7:56:19 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Voting liberal on Obamacare was not a “procedural” vote.

+1

17 posted on 03/08/2019 7:56:24 AM PST by RckyRaCoCo (Please Pray For My Brother Ken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Clearly a “compromised” man


18 posted on 03/08/2019 7:57:17 AM PST by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All

You cannot convince me that the deep state doesn’t have something on him...And they jerk his chain every single time they need something.

Chief Justice John Roberts is compromised and there is no way you can convince me otherwise.


19 posted on 03/08/2019 7:58:25 AM PST by areukiddingme1 (areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
working to shield it from accusations the justices are politically motivated

No liberal justice ever worries about this "problem".

Dick.

20 posted on 03/08/2019 7:58:39 AM PST by dead (Our next president is going to be sooooo boring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson