Not even going to click on the horseclinton.
Wow. Your comment is longer than the article.
A puppy wouldn’t piss on that paper.
I guess having a marxist muslim America-hating faggot illegal alien enemy combatant as commander in chief fit in better with the ‘best traditions of military service’
Richard Mutt? Oh that’s an ‘i’.
When is it going to be?
This guy’s reasoning is nothing more than Democrat talking points wrapped up in “credibility” of his prior service. He is no different, nor does he have any more authority for his opinion than anyone else. His reasoning, if you want to call it that is completely flawed and represents TDS.,
I bet the traditions go all the way back to General Benedict Arnold.
I don’t care if you’re with King George, or modern-day elites. If you’re not with “the people” and The Constitution, you are a traitor. And at this time, “the people” have elected Trump to be commander-in-chief.
It’s great if you advise him in areas you disagree.
It’s fine if you let the world know you disagree with the elected US president.
It’s not OK if you attack him.
There can be a fine line between public disagreement and attacks. But “the pen is mightier than the sword” and the difference in intended outcome between “character assassination” vs “Lincoln assassination” may not be that big - what is the intent of this article?
Meet a graduate of any military academy and you will soon learn the phrase "ringknocker".
Guess what the author of the pitiful hit piece is?
I thought this was about Obama or Clinton.
Bummer he doesn’t seem to have a twitter account - I wanted to give him some feedback.....