Posted on 02/19/2019 8:54:45 AM PST by jazusamo
If this is true, ALL heads should roll. Even McCain, dig him up....
Yep, it makes sense.
Thanks for posting this.
This meeting may have happened or didn’t happen as per the link below.
It is probably a safe bet that every republican on that committee and others were told about this bs verbally or shown it, in a one to one private discussion during or after the 2016 election.
Why! Simple, to poison any relationship that president elect Trump, might have had with these people.
Gonna have to build a bigger PRISON!!!
GET TO WORK YOU LAZY BASTURDS!
They ALL need to be in PRISON! ALL OF THEM!
Precisely what he’s doing. He’s getting out in front of a hanging offense.
Why do I have my doubts this is true?
That’s how I see it as well: The Comey-McCabe-Rosenstein-Brennan-Clapper-Rice-Jarrett CIA-FBI-NSA-WH-DOJ cabal used this to “ocer their tracks” by telling Congress they were investigating Trump. But not HOW they had manufactured evidence and meetings and files to “justify” WHY they started ivnestigating Trump!
Comey testfied that Congress was not notified. Which liar to believe?
McCabe would be perfectly fine filling mass graves, provided that no one vigorously objects. This guy is a major-league stool sample and belongs in prison.
btt
These coup plotters mislead the Gang of Eight just as they misled the FISC and the American people...
Bump!
“This crime extends across party lines.”
You have major players, bit players, people that knew things but kept their mouths shut. A lot of people squirming to survive.
A complex brew.
The Trump team will want to expose some and force others to do their bidding.
So is that the meeting where they voted for McCain to leak the pgony dossier?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Cromwell%27s_head
Nunes was recused for about 9 months. Mike Conaway from Texas took his place until Nunes was cleared.
Absolutely Correct.
But these are not petty crimes, these are high crimes that were committed.
Expose em all.
“No one objected,” he added in the interview. “Not on legal grounds, not on constitutional grounds and not based on the facts.”
Based on facts??? Did he reel off some facts for the patriotic gang of eight?
Anyone ever notice that the “facts” are never ever, not ever, spelled out.
When the weasel mentioned to Scott Pelley that he was opening the investigation of Russian collusion, would that not have been a good time for Pelley to interrupt and ask for just a tidbit of evidence?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.