Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Myrddin
There was an enormous growth in power generation in the 50s, 60s and 70s, much of it coal fired. All of those plants are at the end of their economic lifetime...as are the nukes built in the same era.

The US utilities better get serious about replacement power. Unfortunately, utilities are paying far too much attention to Renewable Portfolio Standards which leads to all sorts of gimmicky wind and solar plants, not serious, around-the-clock reliable generation.

In many states, standards are measured by the percentage of retail electric sales. Iowa and Texas, however, require specific amounts of renewable energy capacity rather than percentages and Kansas requires a percentage of peak demand. while most state targets are between 10 and 45 percent, seven states—California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Vermont, and Washington, D.C.—have requirements of 50 percent or greater. RPS requirements can apply only to investor-owned utilities (IOUs), although many states also include municipalities and electric cooperatives (Munis and Co-ops), sometimes with a lower target.
This ridiculous RPS experiment is going to end badly with ultra-high cost unreliable power. Yet the politicians (who know nothing about power) keep pushing it, all because of the fictitious "climate change."

What were your research cars studying?

17 posted on 02/14/2019 9:16:44 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom

Meanwhile up here in NH/MA nobody wants a natural gas line from PA in their backyard. Plus they do not want a power line from Quebec to bring down hydro electric power south. They do not want the transmission lines because it will ruin their view or decrease property values. There is enough excess hydro electric power available from the dams on the Saint Lawrence Seaway to power most of New England.


20 posted on 02/14/2019 9:39:20 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
What were your research cars studying?

5 coal cars (fast dump) were made available. The intent was to measure vibration and temperature effects on bearing and ride quality to predict when maintenance would be necessary. Maintenance in the owner's facility is much less expensive than a breakdown on the road. Each bearing had a vertical channel capable of 100 KHz @ +/- 80 g acceleration. A tachometer integral to a Timken bearing generator provided angular velocity information. Frequencies for cone, cup, cage and rollers were extracted from modulation around the 11 KHz audio range. From that data, over 55 distinct types of bearing defects can be extracted. I did the FFT and data analysis onboard the car, the uploaded to my server in Fairfax, VA via a Kyocera 1XRTT cellular modem to a mySQL database. I had an onboard Garmin GPS to provide time/position information with the data. Local to each train, a Wifi 802.11b radio running in adhoc mode was augmented with an OLSR mesh network allowing a 255 car train to route non-line of sight around a mountain to the monitoring console in the locomotive. My team members at WiTronix built the UI into their console and data traveled in a specialized openDDS publisher/subscriber to allow them to collect the vibration data, temperature data on each bearing (inner/outer) for hot bearing detection, brake piston position and GPS data.

Subsequent to that basic system, I created a network of PIC18F micro-controllers running a CANopen network to modularize the temperature and vibration sensors. Active actuators for handbrake, anglecock and cutlever were added. Sharma and Associates added auto-couplers, controllable anglecocks, handbrakes and cutlevers. WiTronix extended the interfaces to allow remote control of each car without need of human to couple/decouple and set handbrakes. The aim was to reduce injury to brakeman and switchman assigned to the train.

The project was going well. I added a special project with DHS to support tracking containers with full accountability as they traversed truck to train to storage yard.

The trains with all the new capability were ready to hit the road in December 2008. About 3 weeks into January 2009, I had to call all 46 team members in 7 partner companies an announce the program was over. What happened? Obama. We abandoned $1 million in research cars in a yard near Joliet, IL. Much of the project hardware sits in my basement. No money was allocated to return it. A very disappointing end to a fairly successful program.

I did the hardware, software and firmware design. My colleague did the analysis algorithms in Matlab that I implmented in C. Timken did the bearings. Wilcoxon Research built the specialized accelerometers as well as fabricating the hardware. Sharma and Associates in Countryside, IL did the specialized anglecock, cutlever, handbrake design/fabrication. WiTronix was a spin-off of GM Electromotive and became a very successful standalone business. BNSF provided a research caboose for us to use on the road. The 5 cars were made available by an interest coal car owner working out of Roanoke, VA at BNSF. The program was sponsored by the Federal Railroad Administration.

I miss the program. My colleague died from melanoma in January 2010. He did the business development. I did the design/implementation. Lots of hard work with excellent results. Sadly, thrown out by the Obama administration. They didn't like the coal industry.

34 posted on 02/14/2019 10:26:20 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson