Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CaptainK

His wussy answer about not unlocking his phone was ‘private photos’ texts and phone numbers.

What was his managers excuse for same refusal?

Uncooperative litigant is uncooperative.


16 posted on 02/14/2019 6:29:47 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

His “private” photos LOL.

This guy is as sloppy as Bezos. There are already pictures of him on the internet. There is nothing in that phone that can’t already be found on the internet.


23 posted on 02/14/2019 6:40:50 AM PST by CaptainK ('No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

He did not have to unlock his phone to prove he was talking to his agent. Telling his wireless company to allow CPD access to phone records would prove that. As to whether his agent actually heard the attack, how could that be proven or disproven by giving CPD the phone? Calls are not recorded on a phone.


50 posted on 02/14/2019 7:39:27 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson