Okay, today isn’t April Fool’s Day. So WTF?!!!
The 9th circus gets one right, a surprise when it comes to this issue.
“Theodore Roosevelt reserved a 60-foot strip along the international boundary with Mexico for the United States to maintain the area free from obstructions as a protection against the smuggling of goods between the United States and Mexico. In effect, the Roosevelt easement provided the federal government with a 60-foot border right-of-way on which it could build the fence.”
I wasn’t aware that eco-fecal freak laws trumps national security...BUILD THE FARGIN WALL!!!!
Excellent. Let’s build a prototype that is at least 21 feet tall and 1,900 miles long. It’s time to solve this problem.
I’m reminded of the peace process in the Korean conflict when they had to determine the shape of the table to be used and then its size to be gathered around. Same old tactics to keep stalling the success of a venture and creating more feelings of uncomfortable times during a president’s administration to buy votes in 2020. Right out of the Alinsky playbook
rwood
Look for an en banc appeal by the loser envrio-wackoes.
“The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling said the Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 gives the Department of Homeland Security broad authority to construct the border barriers and waive environmental laws in the process. The ruling affirms a district court’s decision that allowed the federal government to construct wall “prototypes” in San Diego and replace primary fencing near...”
WTF! The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals????? Maybe there’s light at the end of the tunnel. MAGA!!!
If Dems don't like it they can go hang Bill Clinton. Happened on his watch.
We built a fekin Panama Canal for crying out loud. Build the damn wall already.
Cue the broken clock gif photo.
T minus 10 Houston ... 9 .... 8 .... 7 ....
More winning!
Probably the luck of the draw in the ninth. I am guessing two rare Republican appointed judges and one liberal judge. As Trump fills the vacancies on the 9th, this rare occurrence could become more common. The dems will still have the edge, but it will become almost even money as to the majority in a random three judge appellate court.
“The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling said the Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 gives the Department of Homeland Security broad authority to construct the border barriers and waive environmental laws in the process.”
Damned if I’m going outside for the next few days.
The falling dung from all those flying pigs could be lethal!
The original proclamation, #758 and signed on 27 May, 1907, only cover land within the State of California and the Territories of Arizona and New Mexico; and where any river or stream forms any part of said international boundary line. Texas is not in the works there but the Rio Grande River’s official river border measurement ranges from 889 miles to 1,248 miles, depending on how the river is measured. So there is no space I can find within the IRIRA of 96 any listing of change to the original proclamation to build next to the river and in areas not covered by a river or stream which is where it leaks into Texas not originally identified.
But there is another can of worms in the original law and the follow up by Clinton. Upon passage of his law, states were restricted from offering in-state tuition at public institutions to students who were not legally in the country. However, violating federal law, several states have passed tuition-equality laws by allowing anyone regardless of legal status to apply for in-state tuition if they meet the state’s eligibility requirements. Why isn’t someone getting arrested by the FBI for violating federal law? And why aren’t the determination of illegal status being identified on this action aiding HS in deportations. And furthermore, how is DACA being allowed to protect illegals when they also violated this law by passing over the boundary already established and pinpointed by size and location as it is in direct conflict without states rights as it is multistate which makes it interstate commerce.
rwood
If the Subway sandwich was intact, there was no attack!