Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) has not offered a specific position on the Green New Deal resolution...

She's the only one.

1 posted on 02/10/2019 3:18:54 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

Says the liar LIE-a-watha. Already proven to be a liar about her “heritage”, why on earth should anyone believe the next thing out of her mouth?


2 posted on 02/10/2019 3:22:01 PM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I hope all Democrats support this plan.


3 posted on 02/10/2019 3:26:05 PM PST by Michael.SF. (California: knowingly give someone aids: misdemeanor. Give them a straw, go to jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) has not offered a specific position”

Considering the proposal would cut Hawaii off I can see why. That would one long underwater tunnel!


7 posted on 02/10/2019 3:36:41 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Marc Morano on Fox & Friends - Broadcast February 8, 2019 - Brian Kilmeade and Ainsley Earhardt

Morano: ‘This plan is plagiarism pure and simple. They borrowed it from the 1960s and 1970s. In my book, I detail how different environmental scares — over population, resource scarcity, even global cooling — had the same solutions: wealth redistribution, central planning, sovereignty limiting, and just a massive government intervention.’

MARC MORANO (CLIMATEDEPOT.COM): Yes, this is essentially the environmental left and the left wish list over the last 40 years all thrown into one package and they don’t want to debate it on the merits of the economics. We’re told we need to do all of this, from banning meat, to airline getting rid — to getting rid of the combustion, internal combustion engine — all to save from us from a climate emergency, and yet we’re not told how to expect better weather if we actually pass this thing. It would have no impact on the climate even if you believe Al Gore and the United Nations and all the silliness that sometimes they claim. This plan is plagiarism pure and simple. They borrowed it from the 1960s and 1970s. In my book, I detail how different environmental scares — over population, resource scarcity, even global cooling — had the same solutions: wealth redistribution, central planning, sovereignty limiting, and just a massive government intervention.

KILMEADE: Marc, what I’m saying is you can be an environmentalist to the left of Al Gore, and obviously she is, and just say this is not practical. I have spent my career as a lawmaker, legislator. Why would you stand behind a deal like this when it is — looks like something that was put out by a 10th grader?

MORANO: Actually 10th is being very, very generous.

KILMEADE: Let’s go seventh.

MORANO: I would go as low as third grade. I mean, this is a — just a big bowl of crazy wish list of everything you could imagine. And I think the whole release of this, they have bungled the release. They put in their unwilling workers. They had to pull it from the website. There’s a whole dispute over what they meant on nuclear power. They haven’t even gotten this straightened out. But what they do have straightened out: this is the litmus test for the 2020 Democratic contenders. And in a way they, have given anyone who cares about free markets, liberty, and science, a grand opening to expose anyone who signs on to this plan.

End transcript

http://www.climatedepot.com/2019/02/08/watch-morano-on-fox-friends-green-raw-deal-this-plan-is-plagiarism-pure-and-simple-they-recycled-same-solutions-of-wealth-redistribution-central-planning-from-previous-eco-scares/


8 posted on 02/10/2019 3:39:16 PM PST by CharlesMartelsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Excuse me? “Key can’t-i-dates”? No comprende.


11 posted on 02/10/2019 3:54:19 PM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
AOC introed the behemoth "Green Dream" in the AM.......but by Feb. 7 afternoon, the Democrat removed the thing from her website
without explanation....following backlash and even ridicule over the G/D's radical plans including a call to
"eliminate emissions from cows or air travel" — and to provide “economic security for those unable or 'unwilling' to work."

dailycaller.com
Virginia Kruta | Associate Editor

‘I WAS LAUGHING SO HARD I NEARLY CRIED’:
WSJ’S KIMBERLEY STRASSEL CAN’T GET OVER GREEN NEW DEAL

The Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel was not impressed by the rollout of the proposed Green New Deal — in fact, she argued that “if a bunch of GOPers plotted to forge a fake Democratic bill showing how bonkers the party is, they could not have done a better job.”

As Democrats rolled out the resolution, the commentary and criticisms rolled out as well. Strassel was firmly and decidedly in the camp of the latter.

"By the end of the Green New Deal resolution (and accompanying fact sheet) I was laughing so hard I nearly cried. If a bunch of GOPers plotted to forge a fake Democratic bill showing how bonkers the party is, they could not have done a better job. It is beautiful."

Strassel followed her initial tweet with a series of key points to illustrate her initial assessment. The facilities, solar panels, and turbines required to deliver “renewable electricity” on the scale described in the GND would take up more space than the entire state of California.......500k square km. Also note, govt (taxpayers) will pay for these—not private sector.

12 posted on 02/10/2019 4:10:32 PM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

High level?

I can see we have a fundamental disagreement already.

Yes, all the ankle biters are on board.


13 posted on 02/10/2019 4:37:54 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
If you grew up in the 70's you know about Deja Vu.

I've heard this tune before, I tell myself, but where?

Then I got it:

Donald Fagen, lead man for rock group Steely Dan, performed it in 1982.

I'll post lyrics and you decide:

IGY by Steely Dan

Standing tough under stars and stripes
We can tell
This dream's in sight
You've got to admit it
At this point in time that it's clear
The future looks bright
On that train all graphite and glitter
Undersea by rail
Ninety minutes from new york to paris
Well by seventy-six we'll be A. O. K.

What a beautiful world this will be
What a glorious time to be free

Get your ticket to that wheel in space
While there's time
The fix is in
You'll be a witness to that game of chance in the sky
You know we've got to win
Here at home we'll play in the city
Powered by the sun
Perfect weather for a streamlined world
There'll be spandex jackets one for everyone

What a beautiful world this will be
What a glorious time to be free

On that train all graphite and glitter
Undersea by rail
Ninety minutes from new york to paris
(more leisure for artists everywhere)
A just machine to make big decisions
Programmed by fellows with compassion and vision
We'll be clean when their work is done
We'll be eternally free yes and eternally young

What a beautiful world this will be
What a glorious time to be free

Yeah, this is what Dems promise - a totally made-up Unicorn world, not based in reality, but it feels and sounds so good! Not true, not practical, not even original...

15 posted on 02/10/2019 4:55:15 PM PST by ZOOKER (Until further notice the /s is implied...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson