Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: morphing libertarian

You might want to read this:

https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/images/public_education/Reading-SCOTUS-Opinion.pdf

I have found countless threads and posts on this forum over the past 11 years who confuse the various parts of a Supreme Court decision. The most common error is to confuse the Main Opinion section with other parts of the published decision. This one is a good example.


230 posted on 02/10/2019 12:50:23 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies ]


To: centurion316

I have given up trying to see this as having a decisive answer. I liked this posters posted I will look at your link. I know how to read court decisions, part of my job for about 15 years.

Either the supremes have to rule ir the secretaries of state have to refuse to put her on the ballot if she is the dem nominee. If she is rejected in 5 or 6 states, it will force the supremes to rule.


233 posted on 02/10/2019 12:58:32 PM PST by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

thanx,don’t see the relevance. The court has shirked their responsibility and they often avoid the central constitutional issue raised by the parties..


235 posted on 02/10/2019 1:00:19 PM PST by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson