Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

So in 15 and 16, the baby boomer curve was already well underway if it just peaked. Yet never heard a peep about those retirements during that time. Just that the rate was falling. It’s been basically static since Jan of 17 except for the last few months.


114 posted on 02/08/2019 5:16:22 AM PST by del griffith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: del griffith
So in 15 and 16, the baby boomer curve was already well underway if it just peaked. Yet never heard a peep about those retirements during that time.

You would have heard it from me here on FR -- on any threads where the labor participation rate was being discussed.

I was really surprised to learn that in the official measure of labor participation rates, an 80 year-old man who is retired, plays golf every day, and has no interest in working is counted the same way as a 40-something man who would be considered a "discouraged" worked not actively seeking a job.

116 posted on 02/08/2019 5:29:43 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson