Could be she’s lying, except her situation is typical for truth tellers, UNlike Anita Hill, Brawley, Blasey Ford, LaCrosse, etc.
Reports didn’t appear all of a sudden. She made contemporaneous reports to others when and soon after it happened, and she meets other criteria used to determine the truth of rape. She has specific time and date, and the place that can be verified where she was.
Who knows...
I hadn’t run into anything about the contemporaneous reports; but still, they’re just hearsay 15 years later in the absence of physical evidence.
You don’t seem to understand the stakes: this is the camel’s nose under the tent for “guilty if charged” : which h is the next big of power the Marxists want to destroy the US.
Women, being irrational, don’t care aboutvfootvstamping and “you GO G’RRRRL” —the more so, as at this point, they have “sexual immunity” and think that they can master and ride the storm forever. But these protections, once gone, are ceded forever.