I disagree with the poster, the OlLine Rebel, and have already recommended he/she begin with the burkas he wants cheerleaders to wear.
How I got looped into another discussion I have NO idea.
Oh enough with the strawman about “burqas”.
Yes, those decent church-going people were always covering women’s faces centuries ago.
This is NOTHING like that.
What is so terrible about protecting women’s virtue and honestly, men’s virtue also? That’s the key - VIRTUE.
Why you can’t be satisfied with the cute nice skirts and FULLY COVERED bellies of the ‘50s I don’t know. Not to mention just nice athletic moves, not sexual moves.
Because you disagree with the poster, the OlLine Rebel, who was upholding morality, as real men are to men do, vs licentiousness.Thus in responding to him i also pinged you to "Actually Kaslin argues as if something is wrong with you, like liberals do," but as i mistook kaslin for the author, so in correcting that I also pinged you. That's how you got looped.
Meanwhile the burka argument is a false, eitheer/or dichotomy, as explained .