Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
The proposal, which hasn’t formally been reintroduced in the 116th Congress, would not apply to Supreme Court nominees, circuit court nominees or most Cabinet picks.

And just why the heck not?

6 posted on 01/28/2019 3:23:30 PM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SmokingJoe; All

From the Politico article today it says the decision hasn’t been made as to whom it will and will not affect.

excerpt:

“The change would likely shave debate time for sub-cabinet and District Court nominees, though no decision has been made.”


13 posted on 01/28/2019 3:30:37 PM PST by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: SmokingJoe
...would not apply to Supreme Court nominees, circuit court nominees or most Cabinet picks.

And just why the heck not?

Our gentlemen R's did not want to ruffle any D feathers at the negotiation table?

It is very risky for political amateurs like me to criticize the professionals but it seems to me we get our ass handed to us at a 20 to 1 ratio even when we hold a majority position.

29 posted on 01/28/2019 4:01:02 PM PST by frog in a pot (Result of many state bailouts? Taxpayers elsewhere in America get to finance the Left's growth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson