Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vannrox

Some of the low usage toilets these days work great. Go to Home Depot and look at some of the reviews.

As for the good old days, the old toilets clogged up, too, and had plungers next to them.


2 posted on 01/26/2019 1:36:24 AM PST by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

Yeah. And they would overflow. Yuck.


5 posted on 01/26/2019 2:50:06 AM PST by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

Agreed - we always buy new toilets when we buy and move into a new home. I’ve installed a lot of them. This time I upgraded the style and bought these wonderfully sleek models with dual flush modes. I thought the design was beautiful and would make my wife very happy. She was. The design is brilliant and you would never be able to tell it saves water. Don’t get me wrong, congress can wank off for all its idiocy, but I do not mind the 50% reduction in my water bill for our home. There are additional reasons for the reduction but man, I’m good with all of it.


10 posted on 01/26/2019 3:30:31 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

In a storage building where I work on my collection of jalopies there must be 10 or so toilets sitting for decades.

They are from a commercial building that got renovated a few times close by.

I’m sure the guts have long since rotted away. I haven’t touched them.


13 posted on 01/26/2019 3:46:22 AM PST by wally_bert (We're low on dimes in fun city.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62
Glad to see a positive comment so early in the thread. Figured that there would be almost universal disdain expressed. Count me in as being one who wants the big nose of the gubbermint out of the design of everyday things, and kudos to the innovators who eventually make things work -- the proverbial 'better mousetrap'.

My experience with older low-flush capacity toilets pretty much mirrored the complaints about frequently having to flush twice for an efficient removal of waste from the bowl. But I've bought two high seat, elongated bowl toilets in recent years and they both work amazingly-well. One is an American Standard. The other, I bought last year from Sam's Club, so it's an import. It flushes FAR BETTER than the 3.something gallon crapper from the 70s that it replaced. That one used to clog up with annoying regularity.

Another thing to consider, the more water you have in the tank, the bigger the potential mess if it does get clogged. I don't think many bowls could contain 3.5 gallons of water without overflowing, but could probably contain 1.3 to 1.5 gallons.

28 posted on 01/26/2019 5:34:58 AM PST by DJ Frisat (Hey - what happened to my clever tag line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson